Anschauen Gosnell: The Trial of America's Biggest Serial Killer

Gosnell: The Trial of America's Biggest Serial Killer

Gosnell: The Trial of America's Biggest Serial Killer is a movie starring Dean Cain, Nick Searcy, and Janine Turner. A movie about the horrific crimes and trial of Kermit Gosnell, America's biggest serial killer.

Other Titles
Gosnell: America's Biggest Serial Killer
Running Time
1 hours 33 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Crime, Drama
Director
Nick Searcy
Writer
Andrew Klavan, Phelim McAleer, Ann McElhinney, Phelim McAleer, Ann McElhinney, Andrew Klavan
Actors
Janine Turner, Michael Beach, Nick Searcy, Dean Cain
Country
USA
Year
2018
Audio Languages
Deutsch, English, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Philadelphia Police detectives raid the Gosnell abortion clinic and find bags of aborted fetuses in the hallways. An Assistant DA decides to prosecute when she learns of a patient's death from improper anesthesia and the death of several babies born alive. Testimony from a clinic employee helps the jury decide on a verdict.

Comments about crime «Gosnell: The Trial of America's Biggest Serial Killer» (11)

Phillip photo
Phillip

This is a documentary about the case of the serial killer who is known as the "Sewer Rat Killer". The film is set in 1978 and follows the trials and investigation into the case of the Sewer Rat Killer. The film is a pretty good look into the case and the film makers do a great job of showing the case in a very unbiased way. The film is also very well produced and the actors do a very good job of conveying the characters' emotions and feelings. The film does a good job of showing the trial and the film makers do a great job of making the film seem like a documentary. Overall, this is a good film that does a great job of telling the story of the Sewer Rat Killer.

Timothy photo
Timothy

I have to say that this movie is really good. It is very entertaining, and the acting is really good. It also has a few shocking parts that you won't forget. But it is very violent, and it is really bad. I recommend it to anyone who likes a good movie, or if you just want to watch a good movie.

Austin S. photo
Austin S.

First of all, I thought this film was pretty good. The acting was good and the film did have some pretty good moments. The acting was decent and the film was a lot better than I expected. The plot was very well done and the ending was good. However, the film was not as good as I was expecting. The film did not have a very good ending. I think the ending should have been a little better. Overall, the film was good. It was worth seeing.

Jack photo
Jack

A "reality" TV show about a serial killer on the loose. It's a simple plot, but you could use the time. For this, I'd say it's good. If you're a big fan of the "Serial Killer" genre, you may be disappointed. You can't expect to get the "real story" of a serial killer. But it is a good show. The director, who made "The Killing Fields" and "The Killing Fields 2: The Morning After", and "The Killing Fields 3" is a good choice to make a TV show about a serial killer. He is good at making the story realistic. The real life story is not the same. You won't be shocked, but you won't be scared. It's a good show for people who like this genre. And if you're a fan of the "Serial Killer" genre, you might like it. 8/10

Roy Ray photo
Roy Ray

I watched this film with my boyfriend, we both love crime and suspense films and we were both pleasantly surprised. The story is somewhat thin, but it's a well told story that has some good things to it. The main characters are all well developed, and the cinematography is good, the acting is good, and the characters are well developed. The direction is solid, and it does an excellent job of setting the mood. The film is an example of a well told story, and it is a good example of a good thriller. There is no bad acting, no bad directing, and no bad writing. The film is entertaining and worth seeing.

Johnny D. photo
Johnny D.

I read the book. The book is a great read. But the movie was a very poor adaptation. In the book, Gosnell's victims were brutalized and killed for the purpose of the book. He was doing it to make money and not for pleasure. In the movie, the victims were not brutalized. In the book, Gosnell was not a monster. He was a normal, loving man who was just trying to make money. He was not doing it for the pleasure. The book did a great job of showing the cruelty and depravity of the people who worked with him. In the movie, the victims were not shown as victims. The book was very graphic and brutal and made you feel sick. The movie was not good. It was not a great adaptation. The acting was sub par. The movie was very slow and dragged. I was very disappointed with the movie.

Timothy Fox photo
Timothy Fox

This film is a great follow up to the great True Crime Documentaries of the 1990's. The film was shot in a stylish and beautiful way, the cinematography and set design is brilliant. The cast is amazing, everyone did an amazing job. The film has a great pace and a great pace. The ending was amazing, and it was sad to see the movie end. The film was great to see, but there was a bit of a slow part in the film, but overall it was a great film, the actors and the director did a great job. Go see this film, it's great, it's really good, it's really good.

Kevin Salazar photo
Kevin Salazar

I just watched the movie on HBO and I thought it was great. I thought it was great because it was an accurate portrayal of what happened to the victims. I don't think the movie did enough to give you the background of what happened. I thought it would have been more realistic to show the horrific details of what happened to these people. I think the movie was well done, but it did not give enough information to the audience. The movie was based on the book by Dr. L. Paul Morris and it is also based on a book by journalist Michael Moore. The movie also showed the horrible things that happened to these people. The movie is very well done and I think it is very accurate.

Katherine R. photo
Katherine R.

I was pretty disappointed by this movie. It was a lot like a documentary on the holocaust. The acting was poor, the story was simple, and the ending was a little weak. The movie was also very slow. The film is a combination of many different stories. I really like the idea of a film about a serial killer and the one that it is based on. However, the film was not interesting. It was confusing, and the idea of a serial killer was not original. I would have preferred if the movie had been more of a documentary on the holocaust. This movie had a lot of potential, but was not really well executed.

Thomas B. photo
Thomas B.

I had the good fortune to see this film at the Toronto International Film Festival. It was a great film, and I would recommend it to anyone who likes a good story, good acting, and good film making. The acting is superb, especially by the two main stars, and the film is well made, with some truly beautiful shots of New York City. I would recommend this film to anyone who likes good cinema, and to anyone who likes to be reminded that the art form of film is still alive and well.

Elizabeth photo
Elizabeth

This is a movie that deserves a lot of praise. The acting is superb and the direction is wonderful. I think it would have been a better movie if it was a little longer and the focus had been a little less on the victims. I didn't feel like I really cared for any of the characters. I didn't feel like the movie was about the victims. I also didn't feel like the movie was about the trial. The movie is really about the trial and how it affected the entire country. I think it would have been better if the focus had been on the victims instead of the trial. I think this movie is very well done and I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.