Anschauen Best F(r)iends: Volume 2

Best F(r)iends: Volume 2

Best F(r)iends: Volume 2 is a movie starring Tommy Wiseau, Greg Sestero, and Kristen StephensonPino. Leaving the mortician adrift, the drifter finds himself on an expedition across the Southwest encountering wild and crazy...

Other Titles
Best F(r)iends Volume Two, Best F(r)iends, Best F(r)iends: Volume Two, Best F(r)iends: Unmasked
Running Time
1 hours 33 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Comedy, Drama, Thriller
Justin MacGregor
Greg Sestero
Kristen StephensonPino, Rick Edwards, Greg Sestero, Tommy Wiseau
Audio Languages
Deutsch, English, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Leaving the mortician adrift, the drifter finds himself on an expedition across the Southwest encountering wild and crazy characters through a series of twisted and dark foibles.

Comments about comedy «Best F(r)iends: Volume 2» (13)

Jacob W. photo
Jacob W.

The 2nd installment of the gangster films is still really enjoyable but not as good as the first. This time the script is a bit weaker, the characters are also not that interesting and the story is somewhat weak. If the 2nd part had been a bit better it could have been a masterpiece. The action scenes are also good and it is a great looking film. As for the story, it is a bit weak. The acting is also decent but it's not that good. Still it is a good film and is worth seeing if you are a fan of the first one or just like the action films. Good!

David photo

This film was a real shame to see, i think they could of done so much better with this film and i felt they should of had a script writer with at least some experience. The acting in this film was the main thing that drew me to it, but again, I feel that a better script writer should of made this film a whole lot better. The script was weak, I would say the script could of done a lot better with it. The acting was what you would expect in a James Bond movie, but that is not saying much because it could of done better. But overall, I felt this film was a good little flick, I gave it a 7 out of 10 because it is a really good film, and the best one so far.

Timothy S. photo
Timothy S.

F(r)iends is an overrated movie. If I have to compare this to other movies I would say this is worse than its predecessor, titled Priscilla, although its not as good. The screenplay is good but the movie is not as good as Priscilla. Its the same story and different characters. Even the actors are not in the same class as in Priscilla. One of the good parts is that it does not have the profanity, swearing and sex that was in Priscilla. The acting of Michael Douglas is also better in F(r)iends than Priscilla. I give this movie 7 out of 10.

Megan F. photo
Megan F.

Riff Raff, played by Jason Lee, steals the show in this film. He is a fast talker, so his life goes from bad to worse. A member of a gang that was a part of the Crips, he meets a woman (Mackenzie Davis) in a bar and the two become fast friends. She is also a member of the gang, but the relationship is never described. After this, they go on a quest to find the gang leader (Jerry Goldsmith), a mentor for Riff Raff. The relationship between Riff Raff and the gang leader is not explicit and it may be hard to tell if it's any good or not. I would recommend this film, as it is the best of the trilogy. It is also the funniest. It also has a good ending. The first film, "The F(r)iends" is better. I give it a B.

Gregory photo

Winn is at the pinnacle of his life. He's a successful lawyer, he's very close to his family and he's on his way to the pinnacle of his career. Until he's told by his wife that his best friend in the firm, Gus (David Duchovny) has been having an affair. He decides to go back and investigate. He discovers that this affair was in the past. He also discovers that the girlfriend of the husband, Jack (Simon Baker) is also having an affair with Jack. He also discovers that Jack has a young daughter and a young wife. He also discovers that Jack is not his only friend in the firm. There are also some secrets that are being kept. They're hiding secrets from all of them. It's a strange mixture of all the plots that are connected. The first part of the film is interesting, the second part is pretty boring. It's not a bad film. It's not that interesting, but it's not a bad film either. It's not a great film. It's not that bad. It's just a slightly above average film.

Sandra M. photo
Sandra M.

I was pretty much a bit skeptical about this movie when it was announced, but it was a bit of a pleasant surprise. It was a really pleasant surprise because I was really looking forward to it. And boy, was I disappointed. The storyline is very thin and thin. It's basically a bunch of people from the beginning of the story that suddenly get teleported to the other side. At that point, the movie starts and I thought that it was going to get better. But it never does. It just gets worse and worse. And it's just completely and utterly boring. The acting is pretty poor, and that's what I was most disappointed with. If you like your movies with a lot of talking, this is not the movie for you. If you're looking for a very bland movie, this isn't the movie for you either. This is a movie you need to see with someone, and not with your friends, because it will definitely get boring. I give it a 3/10.

Sandra P. photo
Sandra P.

I have to say I thought that the movie was not as good as the first. But it's the same story and a little different in the end. The movie is about a gang that is trying to live their lives as normal, even though they are "off the grid" from the outside world. It's a bit predictable, but the movie has some action and a nice atmosphere. The music is also good, but I think the best thing is the atmosphere it creates. Overall it's a good movie to watch on a Saturday night, especially for me. Maybe it's not the best movie out there, but it's better than some movies I've seen. And for that, it's good.

Keith P. photo
Keith P.

I really liked the first part of this movie, because it had a few good jokes, a solid story and a few interesting characters. However, the second part was really too slow and boring, especially because the characters were all quite lame. It was obvious that the second half was supposed to be faster, and the plot was pretty weak, making the whole thing very difficult to follow. It was like the writers just started writing, and they thought that it would be funny to put a little bit of exposition in it so that you would be completely informed about the plot of the second half of the movie, which is completely unnecessary. If you want a fast movie to watch, you should watch this movie, but if you want to see something more serious, then I would recommend to watch the first one first.

Judith W. photo
Judith W.

I was really pleased with the first two parts of "F(r)iends." If you haven't seen the first part, you should. It's a good start and the plot was well thought out. "F(r)iends: Volume 2" was a very different film. This one was much better and you could tell it was a lot more scripted and thought out. There were a few slow parts in this one, but they were done in a good way. As a matter of fact, some of the "slow" parts are much better than in the first film. It's not as exciting as the first part, but it's still pretty good. I think the plot was really good, but I still can't help but think the acting was a little bit off sometimes. I was a little confused with the character that played Jason Voorhees, though. His acting was good, but I can't help but think he was a little too wild. It's funny, but I still can't help but think that he's a little too wild. In the end, I really enjoyed the film, but I don't think it was as good as the first film. Overall, I really liked the first two parts of "F(r)iends." They were good, but this one is much better.

Bobby photo

The First and Second volumes are amazing and wonderfully done. But this one is not. It's a little better than the first, but it's not much better than the second. The First Volume, I think, is much better than the second, but it's not the best in this film. All in all, it's a good film that makes you think and you feel like you've just watched a great movie. I liked it, but it isn't one of my all time favorites.

Stephanie Holmes photo
Stephanie Holmes

These movies are so many in number and the fun is having to see all of them at the same time. This is a great movie to enjoy and laugh at. It's one of the few times you can get away with watching a movie without knowing what's going to happen next.

Ronald Alvarez photo
Ronald Alvarez

In the first part of the series, The Dying is a desperate and trying to survive character. In the second part, The Dying is the mysterious, emotionally bankrupt and mentally tortured character. This part of the series has a more straightforward approach. It is a film about the characters and what they are going through. It does not make much sense or give away too much of the mystery. The feeling of confusion is still there. This film is a little slow in places, and for a while, I was very bored with the characters. The acting is good, with some good comedic moments. This is a good movie for a few laughs, or to watch with your friends. 7.4/10

Evelyn Wagner photo
Evelyn Wagner

The movie is not for the faint of heart. For the most part, it is dark, as in the book, but there are some light moments in it. As usual, there is violence, and some graphic depictions of sexual violence. It is definitely not for the faint of heart. The author, James Ellroy, obviously tried to avoid any graphic scenes. There is a lot of nudity in this movie, and one nude scene. There are many things that you need to look for. If you enjoy books, you will like this movie. If you don't like books, you may be turned off.