Anschauen Chef Flynn

Chef Flynn

Chef Flynn is a movie starring Flynn McGarry, Meg McGarry, and Paris McGarry. Ten-year-old Flynn transforms his living room into a supper club using his classmates as line cooks. With sudden fame, Flynn outgrows his bedroom kitchen,...

Other Titles
Sefas Flynnas, Chef Flynn - najmłodszy kucharz świata
Running Time
1 hours 22 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Cameron Yates
Meg McGarry, Flynn McGarry, Paris McGarry, Will McGarry
Audio Languages
Deutsch, English, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Ten-year-old Flynn transforms his living room into a supper club using his classmates as line cooks. With sudden fame, Flynn outgrows his bedroom kitchen, and sets out to challenge the hierarchy of the culinary world.

Comments about documentary «Chef Flynn» (8)

Steven photo

This film is a simple, yet profound portrait of a chef in Germany. I've never been a chef, but I've loved cooking as a hobby since childhood. I'm a cook who can put on the finishing touches to a typical dinner at my favorite restaurant, which I only go to once a month. And I've also been a chef, but not very much. However, this film is about the life of a chef who goes through life as a full time job and loves cooking. He's also a father, and a wife, and a lover, and a husband. It's a very short film, but I found the story to be extremely moving, and also very funny. I think this film could help anyone to become a chef, or someone who loves cooking, or anyone who is in the middle of this. I really liked this film, and I hope you do, too. It was a very good and simple film. 7/10

Amber photo

This is a short documentary about the life of the chef of the Michelin restaurant. I have seen this in London in 2011. The story starts with the cook who is famous for his culinary creations, his creativity and his eccentric personality. He has a lot of success with his restaurants, but his business is not what it used to be. He now only knows about cooking and working with food. He is now preparing for the great chef, the Michelin Man. The chef gets an appointment with the chef of the Michelin restaurant and learns how he can work for the man who has made his life a misery. The chef starts his preparations for the Michelin Man and gets a taste of life in France. This is not a good documentary, it does not explain anything about the chef or about the chef. This is not an opinionated documentary. This is just a documentary that teaches you the things that are important in life and does not tell you anything. There is a lot of TV interviews, but they do not tell you much about the chefs or about the life of the chef. I would say that this is a good documentary, but not good enough to be a good movie.

Pamela Freeman photo
Pamela Freeman

This is a well made documentary that doesn't mince words about the human costs of the Iraq war, and it is both well filmed and well acted. The documentary focuses on the lives of a bunch of unemployed men and women who were all trained to be soldiers in the military and to be cooking cooks. Most of the film focuses on the members of the family unit, and it is interesting to see that some of the families have been torn apart by the war. Some of the families are former soldiers, and some are from countries that have a long history of violence. We also see how the families are coping with the new role of their sons and husbands, and how they try to make sense of their lives. We learn about the people involved in the war, and how the war has affected their lives. There are many stories in this film, some are very sad, some are humorous, and some are interesting. The biggest point of the film is that it is important to understand the people who are affected by the war, and to understand the effect the war has had on their lives. The film is well-made, and the soundtrack is a nice accompaniment to the film. I would recommend this film to anyone who wants to know more about the human costs of the war.

Brenda V. photo
Brenda V.

This documentary is really interesting to watch. It has a very good and creative look to it. The cast are really good. There is not a lot of great scenes, but it's still a good documentary. The focus is on cooking, and cooking is really important to the film. There is some good info on some aspects of food and cooking. I really liked the way the cast are portrayed. It's interesting to see how a foodie could be from an outsider point of view. I really liked how it was written and directed. It's a little on the long side, but I really liked it.

Phillip photo

I went to watch this film with no expectations, but was surprised to find that it was a great documentary. The film is beautifully shot and it made me feel so uncomfortable when I left the theatre. The film is so powerful and realistic that you don't feel like you are watching a documentary but instead a character of a real life person. This film is an antidote for the mainstream film industry. This film is so powerful that it should be seen by anyone, and it is also a great tool for getting back to your roots. If you haven't seen this film, do so immediately.

Judy C. photo
Judy C.

I just got back from watching "Eating Out", a new documentary on Gordon Ramsay's "MasterChef". I thought it was an interesting look at the life of one of the most recognizable chefs in the world. It's an interesting look at what drives the people who love the food and make it for us. Gordon Ramsay, an on-air chef at "TLC" on TV, is the man who really invented the show. Gordon is brilliant in his own way and has always been able to make us smile. But, I think he has also been a big part of the problem that has held back the restaurant industry. His ideas have always been out of touch with the taste of the American public. There are times where he has said things that are not good for the world. It was great to see him open up a little bit and talk about how the American public doesn't seem to understand that there are different styles of food and how they are not necessarily the same. And then he talks about how if he were to make a show about Mexican food he would have to be the same as the Mexican restaurant in Mexico. I think we are beginning to see that many of his ideas have been totally out of touch with the tastes and needs of the American public. I know people will say "well, that is just a little taste of what I want to see" but that is not true. I think it is great to see that he is a man who can make something work and be successful. I think it is great that he is able to be honest and open up about his beliefs and desires. I think that is what is really important in a person. The film is not trying to make him out to be a good person but rather it is a look into his life and his work. He is a very successful man who was willing to take on a role that he thought was impossible to play. He is the man that everyone looks up to. When he talks about his success, it is because of how much he has achieved. That is what I really liked about the film. I was really taken in by the story and the people that he is surrounded by. I think that Gordon really wants to make it work for everyone. He talks about the difference between the American and the rest of the world. He says that America is a place where you just have to work for the first time to get the job. He talks about how people do not get what it is like to work in a restaurant. I think that is really interesting. Gordon is saying that it is not just about the money

Rose H. photo
Rose H.

This documentary is about Chef Flynn, an over-the-hill kitchen and restaurant owner who's following in the footsteps of his late brother, Sam. He's more concerned with finding a place to cook at and get his heart set on, than with money. The documentary starts off with Sam's earlier cooking videos on YouTube, but it quickly turns into a look into what Chef Flynn thinks is the best restaurant in all of Texas. It's interesting to see his ideas evolve throughout the documentary as well as how Sam's ideas and techniques are being influenced by Chef Flynn. I thought the story was a bit thin and a bit predictable, but I guess that's because Chef Flynn is very likable and I didn't have any bad feelings towards him. He's very charismatic and I'd like to see him succeed. As a documentary, it was quite good. The editing was done well, and it was good to see Chef Flynn, Sam, and his brother talk about his journey. The cinematography was also good, with a few beautiful shots. Overall, I'd say that this is a good documentary that doesn't need to be watched for food reasons. It's a great look into the career of Chef Flynn, as well as the restaurant scene in Houston. I think the food is the main focus of the documentary, but it also talks about other things such as the food and the people who work at the restaurant.

Brandon Burns photo
Brandon Burns

Flynn, a food critic for the New York Times, gives us his views on food and food companies. What he finds is so disturbing that he makes a documentary of his experience. The most interesting thing about this documentary is that it makes you see the problem in a different light. If you're a food critic, you probably think that the food you consume is of such importance that it's worthy of your time and attention. If you're a food company, you probably think that the food you eat is the best food there is. In this documentary, we see both sides of the argument. Flynn says that food companies are a business, but the food that they serve is something that can never be bought. It's raw, uncooked, unprocessed, and it tastes better than anything you can get in the store. And it's that unprocessed, unwholesome, raw food that the critics like him like to eat. But he does also criticize the companies that sell their food to consumers. He says that the companies are "feeding the masses," but when they serve their food, they serve it in a way that you don't want to eat. In a way, the companies are treating food as a commodity. Flynn finds that the food that is served to him is cooked, but not served by anyone who knows the difference between food that is cooked and food that is raw. And that, in a way, is the problem with food. It's not cooked properly. You can't taste the difference. The food that we eat should be raw, uncooked, unprocessed. It should taste good. Food is a commodity. And, by the way, food isn't necessarily the best thing to eat, as a movie critic might have you believe. He says that most of the food we eat comes from animals that are abused, but the food companies are making money off the people who eat these animals. You're probably not going to like this documentary, but it's certainly worth a watch.