Anschauen Colette


Colette is a movie starring Keira Knightley, Fiona Shaw, and Dominic West. Colette is pushed by her husband to write novels under his name. Upon their success, she fights to make her talents known, challenging gender norms.

Other Titles
Colette: liberación y deseo, Koletė, Colette: Liberación y deseo, Kolete, コレット, Colette: Príbeh vásne
Running Time
1 hours 51 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
History, Drama, Biography
Wash Westmoreland
Rebecca Lenkiewicz, Wash Westmoreland, Richard Glatzer, Richard Glatzer
Keira Knightley, Robert Pugh, Dominic West, Fiona Shaw
UK, France, Hungary, Netherlands, USA
Audio Languages
Deutsch, English, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

After marrying successful Parisian writer Henry Gauthier-Villars, known commonly as "Willy" (Dominic West), Gabrielle Colette (Keira Knightley) is transplanted from her childhood home in rural France to the intellectual and artistic splendor of Paris. Soon after, Willy convinces Colette to ghostwrite for him. Colette, in turn, pens a semi-autobiographical novel about a witty and brazen country girl named Claudine, sparking a bestseller and a cultural sensation. After its success, Colette and Willy become the talk of Paris and their adventures inspire additional Claudine novels. Colette's fight over creative ownership and gender roles drives her to overcome societal constraints, revolutionizing literature, fashion and sexual expression.

Comments about history «Colette» (19)

Albert Mason photo
Albert Mason

The movie is very very good. If you want to know the true story about the execution of Charles Manson, this movie is just right. It's so well directed, acted and written. The movie is a compilation of two films, one that was made in 1990 and another that was made in 1978. The 70s is well known for being an excellent time in film history, and the movie is a fitting tribute to that time.

Christopher J. photo
Christopher J.

I loved this movie. It was beautifully shot and acted, and the script is very well written. The main characters are believable and natural, and although the story may have been a little predictable, I still enjoyed it. The movie is not the best I have ever seen, but I thought it was very good. The best part is the performance of Sophie Marceau, who is outstanding, but the other actors do a very good job as well. If you haven't seen this movie yet, go see it, and you will not be disappointed. I highly recommend it.

Larry photo

When I first heard that a film was being made about the English poet John Keats, I was skeptical. After all, Keats was not a particularly well-known figure, and the idea of turning the great poet into a romantic hero was, to me, a bit of a stretch. However, I was pleasantly surprised. This film is a very good film about the life of John Keats. The film is well-paced and the cinematography is beautiful. The acting is great. The film is well-written and well-acted. The film is also very well-made. This is a very good film. I highly recommend it.

Dennis Marshall photo
Dennis Marshall

I had very little interest in seeing this film, as I had heard the negative comments, but I was intrigued by the cast and the general premise. I was not disappointed. The plot line is interesting and I enjoyed the characterization of the characters, and the way the two main characters, both professionals, worked together was impressive. The three main characters in particular - Maggie (a veteran who has a "B" and is a "good-enough" journalist), Diane (a woman with a "C" and is a "bad-enough" journalist) and Pam (a woman with a "D" and is a "sick-enough" journalist) - were all likable and credible. They were all quite different in personality, but I didn't care for the other three characters (particularly the boy) and couldn't identify with any of them. The plot and characterizations were interesting and the writing was solid. I thought that the cinematography was well done and that the editing was well done, although the film would have been better if it had a little more cut, in my opinion. Overall, a good film.

Juan Simpson photo
Juan Simpson

This film is a film about the relationship between two sisters, but the film doesn't really focus on the relationship between the sisters. The film is really about the two sisters' struggle to maintain their own identities, and to maintain their marriage. The film does show how their marriage is going, and how they are trying to maintain their identity as a family. The film is really about the struggle of two sisters to maintain their own identities. This film is a good film, but it doesn't really focus on the relationship between the sisters.

Barbara Chavez photo
Barbara Chavez

One of the great movies of the late 50s and early 60s. It is one of those rare films that is so good it could only have been made by someone with enough courage to try something new. Set in a time when Robert Kennedy was President, and then the Watergate Scandal was in full swing, and the Kennedy family was in disarray, this film is a must see for all fans of film noir and or a movie with a mystery element.

Christine R. photo
Christine R.

I really liked this film. It's not the greatest film I've seen but it's an interesting look at a woman who was in charge of her own empire. I'm not sure what she did, but she certainly didn't do much for the country. The film follows her life from the start of her marriage to the end. There's a lot of history, a lot of interesting characters and it's all tied up neatly with a neat ending. I was also impressed by the acting. The film is made up of many famous actors and actresses, but they all give great performances. The acting is great in this film and it's not as if there is a lot of dialogue. It's very intense and there's a lot of dramatic moments. It's not your typical Hollywood film. It's not about a love story, it's not about a Hollywood family. It's about a woman who was in charge of her own empire and it's all tied together with some very interesting things. I was impressed with the film and I'm looking forward to seeing it again. I thought it was a good film and I'd recommend it to anyone.

Hannah photo

I think the movie was good but some scenes were hard to take. I do not understand why the last scene had no action. I just was wondering how to get rid of the movie. But i thought the movie was good and I think the movie is underrated.

Howard T. photo
Howard T.

I agree with most of the reviews here, this is a film that is essentially well made, but a bit hard to understand. I found it to be a confusing tale, that never seemed to settle down into one of the three main plots. It seemed to me that the director wanted to show three different points of view (including a bit of background on each of the three) in a single movie, rather than having it flow smoothly. I also think that this movie has a few things wrong with it. I thought that the ending was pretty bad, and that it would have been better if it was used more to set up the next movie, but I thought that this movie had too many loose ends to tie. I also thought that there were some scenes that didn't make much sense. For example, one character, who I thought was supposed to be someone we don't know very well, was suddenly shown as being someone we do know very well, and the way he was introduced was very confusing. Overall, I think that this movie is very good, but I don't think that it's as good as some other films in the same genre.

Sandra photo

I'm not sure how to feel about this movie. I'm not a huge fan of Sidney Lumet, who's only really done one good movie, "An Officer and a Gentleman" (the best of the three he made). He's done a couple of good movies, but not this one. The movie is a bit slow and it is very long, so I guess it's a bit of a waste. I'm not sure why this movie is getting so much attention. I'm not sure why people are talking about it so much. I just don't think it's as good as it is being said. It's not bad, but it's not good. It's definitely not a movie you'd want to see again.

William W. photo
William W.

The movie has a great atmosphere and the story is excellent. The director shows the things which happen in the daily life of the women in the 20th century. The movie has a good performance from the actors and the script is very interesting. The movie has a good balance of the past and the present. If you are in search for a good movie in the 20th century, I recommend you to watch it.

Evelyn Morrison photo
Evelyn Morrison

The focus of the film was on a young woman called Prudence, the young woman who got married when she was nineteen and later had a child by the same man. Prudence is portrayed as a person who was naive and had a good heart, so if she was a victim of abuse she was not necessarily a monster. The woman who played her was pretty amazing. The film is a very hard look at the abuse she suffered, and it shows the depth of her suffering. I thought the film did a pretty good job of showing the power of a woman who could have an abuse victim for a wife. I think this film does a good job of showing the repercussions of the abuse that Prudence endured and how she eventually ended up taking matters into her own hands and taking care of herself. The film was good and I would recommend it to anyone. There is a lot to learn from this film.

John Martinez photo
John Martinez

I've been waiting to see this movie for a while now. I've always been a fan of the German film industry and I've always been a fan of the "war" movies. So, it was a great pleasure to see this movie. I thought the movie was very well done. I thought it was very well done, with a good story, and a very good cast. I liked the performances of both the leads. I thought they did a great job. I thought the movie was very well done, and it was a very good movie. I would definitely recommend this movie. I really enjoyed it. I would give it a 7 out of 10. I would definitely recommend this movie to anyone.

Amber photo

I'm not sure what the big deal is with the "Poetic Justice" tagline. It's a nice title, but it doesn't have much to do with the film. It's a little more about the history of the French Revolution than the French Revolution itself. I guess the point is that this film was made in a time when the French Revolution was a major news event, and the fact that it is filmed in black and white would be a little bit of a distraction. That's not a big deal, though, because the film is a pretty good movie, and it's a pretty good story. The film is told in a fairly straightforward fashion, and I don't think it's ever boring. It's not the best film I've ever seen, but it's certainly not the worst. It's not really a story of one man's struggle to change the world, but of the struggles of a bunch of people in a small town in the French countryside. The film is about a group of people who try to escape the oppression of the French Revolution, and their efforts to make a life in a different country. They go to Paris, and try to escape the oppression of the French Revolution, but the French Revolution is just as oppressive as the British. The people in this town are trying to make a life for themselves, but they don't have the money to get out of the town. They have to rely on the kindness of strangers for help. This is a story about people who are trying to make a life for themselves in a hostile environment, and it's a story about how one man can make a difference in a hostile environment. I liked the film. It's very well made, and it's a good story. I recommend it.

Bryan photo

There is a scene in the movie where the head of the House of Representatives meets with his chief of staff and says that the president is being kept in a closed room. The chief of staff says that the president is being kept in the same room as a rubber suit. He then goes on to say that the president has been kept in a rubber suit for 20 years. I've read the book and I think that it is the most accurate depiction of the actual events that took place. This movie was a good movie and it should be watched. I'm glad that it was made. I thought that it was well made and it should be watched. I think that it was a good movie and I would recommend it to anyone.

Charles S. photo
Charles S.

I'm surprised at the ratings. I thought this movie was wonderful. It was so much more than a sex-driven movie. The truth of the American past and the heart of the USA. How we have been torn apart and turned upside down. I think the story was amazing and so true. My wife and I can't get enough of this movie. We love it so much that we have a movie poster made in the style of the movie. It is the biggest movie we have ever bought. We really do love it. We do feel it is historical and not a fiction. I think it is a great movie that everyone should see. If you have not seen it, do yourself a favor and see it. It is one of my all time favorites. It really is the best movie I have ever seen. This movie is very educational and is very interesting. I highly recommend this movie to everyone. Everyone should see this movie.

Janet Tran photo
Janet Tran

If you have not seen "Citizenfour" then you really should see it. It was such a powerful film, but if you are not a fan of Edward Snowden and human rights, you may be turned off. While the film is not without its flaws (many, in fact, are glaring), I really enjoyed it. I have already recommended it to my friends and I am hoping that they will too. The acting was great, the story was very moving and well-done and it was all very believable. I was very impressed with Laura Poitras (who also wrote the screenplay) and I hope that she will do more films like this one.

Sarah B. photo
Sarah B.

This is the first movie I have seen from the new generation of Australian filmmakers, and it is one of the best I have seen. I was a bit sceptical about the idea of a movie about the so called 'rivers of blood' because of the subject matter, but the movie was a lot more than I expected. It was an eye opener and a very good story. I was taken by the story and the acting, and I could not wait to see it again. I am very impressed by the direction and the actors. I would recommend it to anyone who wants to see a good story told in a good way. I think that this is one of the best movies I have seen this year.

Roger Hunt photo
Roger Hunt

I am a big fan of the movie "The English Patient", so I went into this movie with a great expectation. However, this movie was a disappointment. I think the movie was more of a drama than a thriller. The plot was not very interesting. I think the acting was pretty good. However, I didn't like the movie at all. The movie was too long and boring. The movie didn't make me feel anything for the characters. The characters were not interesting and the plot was boring. I don't think this movie is worth watching.