Anschauen Cruel Peter

Cruel Peter

Cruel Peter is a movie starring Angelica Alleruzzo, Antonio Alveario, and Aran Bevan. Peter has been cruel to children, animals and servants for a long time. One night he is ambushed and wakes up in a coffin, trapped after an...

Running Time
1 hours 35 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Horror
Director
Ascanio Malgarini, Christian Bisceglia
Actors
Angelica Alleruzzo, Antonio Alveario, Alessio Bonaffini, Aran Bevan
Country
Italy
Year
2019
Audio Languages
Deutsch, English, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

It is Christmas 1908 in Messina, one of the richest merchant cities of the Mediterranean. Peter, the 13 year-old son of a rich English family is notorious for his cruelty to children, animals and servants. One night he is ambushed and wakes up in a coffin underground in the city's Gothic cemetery, buried in retaliation for his callousness by a servant boy from his mother's estate. When a powerful earthquake razes Messina to the ground, Peter is trapped and his whereabouts are forgotten. Until a century later an English archaeologist and his daughter arrive in the city.

Comments about horror «Cruel Peter» (14)

Kathleen photo
Kathleen

I was really surprised by this movie, and I thought I had heard the worst of it. But it turned out to be one of the most enjoyable slashers I've seen in a long time. I was pleasantly surprised to see it was actually quite funny and not too bloody, as it's pretty well done. I especially liked the scene where Paul's mother is being tortured, the way the camera angles are used is excellent, and the way the camera cuts are used is perfect. I would recommend this movie to anyone looking for a good, funny slasher movie, and to anyone who likes to see a good movie without all the gore.

Theresa V. photo
Theresa V.

This film was the first to be shown in the UK in 1994, and was one of the most anticipated films of the year. Having been released on DVD in 1998, it was long forgotten until last month when it was finally seen by a UK DVD buyer. It was a strange experience to watch this film, I thought it was really weird, and I am a big fan of the horror genre. But I also thought it was very well made, and the atmosphere of the film was great. I don't know if it's the horror film's fault, but the way it was shot was very good, it looked very atmospheric. It was definitely a different look to horror films, but the film was never boring, it was always exciting. The acting was good, and the actors did a good job in the film. The film also had a great story to it, it wasn't just a horror film, and it wasn't just about one man fighting the demons. I don't think it was a good film, but it was a good film. The film was shot on location in Scotland, and there are some great locations used in the film. I recommend this film to anyone, it is definitely a good film, but I wouldn't recommend it to horror fans, because it isn't scary, but it is good and it is a good film. If you haven't seen it, I would definitely watch it, but I wouldn't watch it for the first time. It is a really good film, I recommend it to anyone who likes horror films, and it is definitely a good film to watch. 7/10

Barbara H. photo
Barbara H.

I remember watching this as a kid and really liking it. It was scary and entertaining and never once boring. This version is even scarier and I liked it more. I love the fact that the ghosts were more menacing in this movie. I love how the ghosts showed up during the day and stayed off screen during night. Also I like how the whole town is attacked by a ghost. I love the fact that the old lady has a son who was one of the victims in the first movie. This one is much better and I loved how they kept the names of the victims in this one. The original one was about a family that was attacked and the one in this one is about a family that was attacked and then the spirit of a girl who was killed. This movie is great. It's good for Halloween and if you're a fan of the first one this is a good addition.

Emily S. photo
Emily S.

I have read the reviews and really do not understand what people are saying about this movie. For me it was an enjoyable movie. It's a mix of gore, horror, romance, and comedy. And it was really well done. It was funny, it was suspenseful, it was dark, it was funny, and it was suspenseful. I'm just glad that it was rated R and not R-rated because it was a little bit too gory. But if you are looking for a scary movie to watch with your friends and not too much, this is the movie for you.

Joshua G. photo
Joshua G.

If you like "the John Waters films" then you'll love this one. The film is a lot like his previous films "Out of the Blue" and "Porky's", a horror/thriller/porn film. It's just like those two, but with a different kind of premise. It's a fun film that's pretty entertaining. There are some great performances by both the actors and the writers. It's also a lot of fun. The acting by the "freak" actors is pretty good. I think they did a really good job, especially in the final scenes. The story is pretty good. There's some great comedy in the film as well. I recommend it. I give it a 7 out of 10.

Deborah Patterson photo
Deborah Patterson

I had this film on my short list for a long time. I finally saw it in a local video store. It was not what I was expecting. It was really good. The acting is good, especially from the two leads. The cinematography is really good, I love the scenes in the forest and the cabin. There are also some really creepy moments. The ending is different from what I expected but I liked it. Overall it's a really good movie. If you like slashers and you like the acting and story, then you will like this one.

Ralph Y. photo
Ralph Y.

I went to see this movie at a special screening on Friday, and I must say that I was rather disappointed. The movie is very much like a slasher movie, but instead of having the killer come in the form of a maniacal killer, we have a man named Peter who gets away from his insane girlfriend and is sent to a mental institution. There, he meets a nurse and a psychologist and begins a journey to discover the truth about his past. I thought that the ending of the movie was really good, and I thought that the acting was good. The characters were well-written and there was a lot of depth to the characters. The story was good and the acting was great. I thought that this was a very good film, and I recommend it to everyone.

Tiffany Willis photo
Tiffany Willis

I have to say I am a little disappointed with this movie. The special effects were pretty good, but the plot was weak and predictable. I would say this movie is worth watching if you are a horror fan, but not a big fan of the genre. The acting was average. I think this movie could have been better, but overall it was better than expected. This movie has a great cast, but it just wasn't good enough for me to recommend it to anyone.

Sara photo
Sara

So I saw this movie at a premiere in NYC. I was expecting a decent film but I was not prepared for how bad it was. This was not a horror movie. This was a parody of horror. The actors are playing very well and the characters are very funny. The plot is very silly. It is one of those films that you can watch several times and you will be shocked every time. I was very disappointed that this was not a mainstream film. It is a cult film and should be seen by the most devoted of fans.

Joseph H. photo
Joseph H.

The final part of the Peter Cushing's Dracula trilogy, this one is a bit more sophisticated than the others. Dracula is back in the field of action, and this time he's being driven into the forest by a group of missionaries. They've been hired by the evil Count to find and kill a famous nobleman, but the Count wants the nobleman's daughter, a rare, beautiful creature, to be sacrificed in order to save her. Dracula goes on a killing spree, and the missionaries manage to kill him. Dracula is now a sick and demented man, and must be put down. The first thing I noticed about this movie was that it was set in a modern world. It seems that the time period was the 1920's. I thought that it was interesting that the Dracula and the missionaries were portrayed as modern people. I thought that the movie was good, but it could have been better. I recommend this movie for those who like more sophisticated movies. 7/10

Jesse G. photo
Jesse G.

I watched this movie and liked it a lot. It had a great story and it had great acting. I'm really looking forward to the sequel.

Russell Fuller photo
Russell Fuller

I've heard so much about this movie, and I really have to give it some credit for being different than the usual "B-movies" you'll find on cable. The premise is pretty unique and creative, and the acting is pretty good. The story is actually quite interesting and well-thought-out. The film is very stylish, and the cinematography is outstanding. The gore, however, is rather tame, and the film doesn't really provide much in the way of atmosphere. The film also has some rather confusing plot points that, while not bad, are just not interesting. There's a twist at the end that I don't really understand, and I honestly wasn't sure what the twist was supposed to be. It is a shame that the film isn't better known, because it really could've been an interesting and unique horror film. If you're a fan of the genre, then you should definitely give this movie a shot. Otherwise, I would recommend that you wait until the DVD comes out.

Dylan Gibson photo
Dylan Gibson

So you know what, it was ok, it was not the worst horror film I have ever seen, but it was not a great film either. The problem is, it isn't the most scary, or the most entertaining either. It has a decent plot, but it is very basic. The movie has a very dull and boring plot, and it also has a terrible and boring ending, but all in all it is not that bad, you could probably enjoy it for what it is.

Eric W. photo
Eric W.

I've seen several of the books by Stephen King and have been fascinated by his work for many years. This is one of the best films I've seen. I found the acting to be good, the script to be good, the direction to be good, and the story to be good. The only thing that could have made this a better film is if King had given it a higher budget. This is a low budget film that was made in order to make a better film. The only thing I would have changed was the editing. The editing was the most important thing. The story was the most important thing. I also wanted to see how the movie would end. If you have not read the book, you will be disappointed. The ending to this film is an excellent way to end the book. I'm glad I watched this film.