Anschauen NT Live: Cyrano de Bergerac

NT Live: Cyrano de Bergerac

NT Live: Cyrano de Bergerac is a movie starring Michele Austin, Adam Best, and Nari Blair-Mangat. An intense, raw and deep revival of Rostand's Cyrano de Bergerac by the Jamie Lloyd Company.

Other Titles
National Theatre Live: Cyrano De Bergerac, Cyrano De Bergerac Presented by Comedie-Francaise, National Theatre Live: Cyrano de Bergerac, National Theater Live: Cyrano de Bergerac
Running Time
2 hours 40 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Jamie Lloyd
Edmond Rostand, Martin Crimp
Philip Cairns, Michele Austin, Adam Best, Nari Blair-Mangat
Audio Languages
Deutsch, English, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

An intense, raw and deep revival of Rostand's Cyrano de Bergerac by the Jamie Lloyd Company.

Comments about drama «NT Live: Cyrano de Bergerac» (25)

Gloria photo

After seeing this film, I have to say it is a very impressive and charming film. However, there is a large gap between the characters and the storyline. The film is about the life of a young girl named Celine and her family during the years of the French Revolution. As the film goes on, the scenes in the house slowly become more and more clear and simple. The narrative flow and the reasons of the events become more and more clear. At first, I did not understand the storyline and was in a bad mood. But after a while I could understand everything. My rating: 7/10.

Nicole Larson photo
Nicole Larson

Not a bad little film. It's about a young man named William who wants to find his lost love but he is a terrible poet. Then he meets her sister but that's about it. The film is a little slow at times but I guess that's the point of it. The acting is good. The ending is a little strange but it all works out in the end. Worth watching.

Alexander Delgado photo
Alexander Delgado

A great tribute to the movie that inspired this film. I will keep it brief. This is the story of two French soldiers who were sent to an isolated village to take care of the villagers. They meet Cyrano de Bergerac and his life is changed forever. The film starts with the film. The actors who played the two soldiers, are as different as the men themselves. The good and the bad. The beginning is very good and shows that the two are the same and are very similar. There are some big problems. The first one is that it doesn't explain why the two met at the village. It is said that they met because the villagers treated them so badly and were afraid of them. But when they are on their own they don't get the chance to tell them the reason. The second one is that they don't get any interaction between them, especially with each other. But it is a good idea. I think that the story could have been a bit more developed but it is still good. I think that the film is very good. It deserves a great rating.

Heather photo

I can't say this film is that bad. Not to compare it with other film is not to do. It's just that. I would say that this film is one of the very few films that really affected me. I've been a fan of Olivier Giroud ever since I first saw him in La Marseille. I've seen this film maybe three or four times, and I still can't get out of the mind of it. For me, this film is one of the very few films that really touched me. I'd probably say it's one of the best films that I've ever seen. One of the main reasons for me to like this film is that I think Olivier Giroud is a great actor. I know he's not the greatest actor out there but he has this amazing talent. When I saw this film I couldn't get out of my mind the thought of what it was about. I was thinking how the film was about. The characters are very realistic and I know that people who have seen the film will know what I'm talking about. The film is about an old man who is telling his son about his greatest war hero of his youth. The film itself is about a little boy who lives in a village with his father. He does not know his father at all. He just knows that he is an old man who is not his father. He has a habit of talking with his own son who does not speak a word of French. The boy does not speak French either. The little boy's father knows the little boy, so he tells the boy that he loves him and that he loves his father. And when the father is gone, the little boy is really alone. He finds his father's diary in the night and reads it. The boy goes to the village and sees that the father is very tired. He tells his son that his father is very tired. The boy doesn't understand, so he gives the diary to his father and tells him that his father is very tired. This is a very good story, and it is told very well. It is very hard to tell. I don't know why, but I really don't care. I'm so impressed by this film. I think that it's a great film. It's a very realistic film, and I think that people who have seen it will know what I'm talking about. I think this film is a masterpiece, and I'm not saying that just because I liked it. The only reason that I liked this film is that I've seen it a couple of times. But I still like it. I can't say that I didn't like it. I think that it's a very good film. It's not a masterpiece like some people say it is, but it's a very good film. If you liked this film, I think that you might like another one that I've seen. I recommend this film to people who are looking for a good film.

Zachary Lawrence photo
Zachary Lawrence

This is not a particularly complex story, but it is very well done. The performances are good, but sometimes seem a little too flat. The young actors all look very natural in their roles, as do the older ones. I especially liked the acting of Katheryn Bigelow, who portrayed the troubled daughter of the owner of the high school, with depth and a touch of vulnerability. The cinematography was good, the production design and costumes were beautiful, and the production values and production value were very good. Some of the music was very good, the violin, cello, guitar and drumming all were very well done. I liked it very much.

Julia C. photo
Julia C.

I have just watched this movie on a UK TV channel, which is not available in the UK. And I must say, I was very impressed. I was also impressed by the local cast, who all managed to bring a lot of character and energy to the movie. Also the scenery and the sets were impressive, so that I felt I was really in the time and place in which the story is set. And this movie also managed to provide a number of hours of entertainment and entertainment for many people. I definitely recommend this movie to anyone, and anyone with a mind for history and who enjoys seeing good movies. 9/10

Donna Perkins photo
Donna Perkins

At least it didn't use a voice-over. I really, really, wanted to like this film. I went into it with low expectations, as I've rarely been a fan of the movie, and I am usually a fan of "TV-musicals." I got a different reaction than I had hoped for. I loved the original, but I thought the musical was one-dimensional. This was much more nuanced. The film's score and dialog are incredible. There is no overuse of music and it never felt like I was watching a TV-musical. I thought the cinematography was good. I don't think I've ever seen a film this visually exciting. I also think that the main problem with the film is that it could have used a little bit more story. There are some scenes that are just so amazing and so moving, but it feels like the story is not complete. I also felt the love scenes were very cliche, and I think this is very "TV-musical." There are a few scenes that really don't work, like the first dance scene. I also think the film really should have been longer, and not quite as much focus on the love scenes. It really did not live up to my expectations. It's a beautiful film, but it's not a great film. It's not a great love story, and it's not a great movie. It's not a great film, period. It's a wonderful love story. I would recommend this film, but it is not a film I would have seen before.

Frances C. photo
Frances C.

For a lot of people, "The Camilla Claudius Cycle" was the first literary version of The Legend of King Arthur. I'm pretty sure I read it as a child, and I never heard about the Cycle until recently. It was a pretty good book, and it definitely appealed to my interest in seeing a version of it, even if it was a film. The one thing that made this adaptation so enjoyable for me was the casting of Rufus Sewell as Camilla. He was a very good choice for the role, as he was just the right size and all. Unfortunately, the one thing that bothered me about the book was the character of Arthur, especially his connection with Guinevere. He was just too cocky, and the character really did not seem to have much affection for her. In this version, he is more stoic and more familiar with his power than he is. As a result, the connection between Camilla and Arthur seemed to be lacking. It was like the character Arthur did not have any kind of connection with her, and they had almost no connection in the story. This made the relationship between them rather one sided. Also, in the book, Camilla was very devoted to Guinevere, and she really did love her. This version had more of a connection between them, but it was still there, but not quite there. Overall, the casting of Rufus Sewell as Camilla was great. I would recommend it to anyone who is interested in the book.

Russell Keller photo
Russell Keller

This movie really reminded me of The Graduate. It's very depressing and emotional. The relationship between the two main characters is great and very believable. But there are some problems with this movie. The story is a bit confusing and the beginning is a little slow. But it does get better in the second half. This movie is worth watching if you have nothing else to watch. It's a little hard to follow at first but it gets easier to follow as the movie goes on. You will be very happy to know that the two main characters are only in it for a few minutes.

Diana R. photo
Diana R.

A boy falls in love with a girl and wants to do everything he can to win her heart. He follows her everywhere, he tells her about his love for her, he goes to every cinema to see the latest hit, he also goes to concerts and political rallies to meet the young people who admire his love. His love is only for her. But a lot of people like her and that's the trouble. I was curious about this movie when I first saw it. I was hoping that it would be a touching love story but I got a much more surprising feeling when I saw it. The movie has a great flow and many scenes move the audience like never before. I thought the direction was superb and I love that the director didn't show the love between Cyrano and Celine, it is shown in the other parts. The last scene of the movie is amazing. I was so moved when I saw the final scene. It is so dramatic and a really great end. I was left with the feeling that I didn't see the end of this movie but that I didn't want it to end, that I wanted to see more. So I will recommend this movie to everyone. I highly recommend it!

Thomas B. photo
Thomas B.

First of all, this is not a classic like Schindler's List. It's not even the best Holocaust movie ever made. But it's a very good movie and worth seeing, especially if you're into films that are not violent, and it's got some good performances. Richard Harris, at age 75, gives a very powerful performance as young Dreyfus, who is very traumatized and at the end, he decides to try to keep his family safe, so he does what any decent human being would do. It's a very sad story, and I could not help but to feel sorry for Dreyfus, and for his family. Even though the movie is not a masterpiece, it's still a very good movie, and I highly recommend it.

Peter W. photo
Peter W.

A beautifully shot and elegantly acted film from director Pedro Almodovar, Cyrano de Bergerac is a coming-of-age story set in a big family home in Southern France. Almodovar's camera is searingly intense, and one could not help but feel it had a kind of overbearing influence on his audience, even in the most natural of settings. The characters are well defined, and the setting and music wonderfully complemented. The cast, however, is without a doubt, the best thing about the film. Its main attraction, however, is the wonderful music composed by Benny Davis, which segues from dramatic and sad to serene and beautiful, yet disturbing at the same time. The music is quite moody, but the film does not rely on it to carry it along, instead, it anchors the story. As a coming-of-age story, it is successful. The film's main flaw is that the characters are simply not likable enough, and, at times, it felt as if Almodovar was just trying to force us to like these characters, which does not work. It is not a good film. It is certainly a different kind of coming-of-age film, though, and it is definitely worth seeing.

Kevin Reynolds photo
Kevin Reynolds

A friend recommended that I see this film after reading the book. I was pleased that the film was based on the novel. The acting was excellent. The story was interesting and kept me on the edge of my seat. It's worth the admission. This film is a must see.

Angela photo

This movie is a bit hard to get through. The acting is pretty bad and the dialogue is hard to understand. The story, while slightly thin, is an interesting take on a young man who must come to terms with his mother's death, and his father's death. The film is much more humanistic than I had hoped, and the ending is quite powerful. It's not a completely satisfying movie, and it's not completely predictable. The main character is well played, but this movie isn't as good as some of Besson's other work. I would recommend it, but there are better movies out there.

Catherine photo

I am not a fan of the Oscar-nominated film. I did like the story, but the screenplay was poor and it had no real dialogues. The directing was just okay. I felt the movie could have been done better. I liked the songs of the movie, but I was not in love with the movie itself. The movie was well-made, but not brilliant. I like all of the actors in the movie, but I just didn't like the movie as a whole. There were some scenes that made me laugh, but I don't think it was enough to be considered a classic.

Daniel photo

I've read all the reviews for this movie, and all the comments I've read, I think there are two things I want to say about the movie. First, that the performances are very good. I'm a fan of Michelle Williams and I think her performance is quite extraordinary, and she's quite good in her role, as well as the other actors. The other thing I want to say is that this movie is very realistic. In the real life of these people, they are a bit more than they are portrayed in the movie. The other thing I want to say is that this movie is very good in the way it's written. The scenes are carefully chosen so that we understand the main point of the movie. I've seen many movies that were too superficial, but this movie is one of the best I've seen. If you're not a big fan of this movie, I think you should see it, because it's a very good movie, and you'll be glad that you did.

Cheryl P. photo
Cheryl P.

I loved this film. I saw it in a theater, and it was much better than I thought. I was initially attracted to the story because of its subject matter and the beautiful photography. The movie is quite slow, and I think it would have benefited from being slightly longer, but the story is so moving that I was glad I saw it. There are several moments where you can actually feel the passion of the characters, especially the characters of Trintignant and Trot, which is an excellent element of the film. I think that the script is a little weak in the last third, but that is an argument for why the movie is so great. I think this is the first film I have seen that features a female lead, which I think is an amazing change. However, I am not sure that this is the best role for Zoe Saldana, but I do think she is talented and does a good job. I recommend this film to anyone who enjoys films about love, or even films about French culture, or even films about the history of love.

Terry B. photo
Terry B.

I don't know why I was so drawn to this film. I wasn't sure what to expect. Was this a fantasy film about a real-life historical figure? Was it a love story? What the hell was this all about? It was everything I wanted it to be. In the first ten minutes, I was completely entranced by the enchanting sights and sounds of the South of France. The film has a strong cast and some very fine performances, but it is the story of Cyrano and the people around him that really grabs you. The acting is superb. You don't get a lot of that nowadays in film, and this is one of the few films that manages to capture the energy of the time period and keep it for an hour and a half. The setting and the scenery are wonderful, and the music is extremely beautiful. The characters are very well written, and they all have their own characteristics. They are not "hated" characters, which is very unusual in films these days, and they don't "win" any kind of "hero" status. I felt for all of them. They are not some arrogant, strong-willed types who are destined to be the hero of the story. They are not just the hero's "enemy" or "opponent", they are not monsters or weaklings. They are all normal, human people who want to be loved, and they all have their own dreams and wants. And when you see them, you realize that they are all doing the best they can to live their lives in the best way they can. This is a very human story, and it's one that deserves to be told. I really liked this film, and I think you will too.

Madison photo

I have never read the book but, if this is the case, it is worth watching the movie. The movie itself is really good. It is very touching and you want to be with Cyrano, and you think how much he would be proud of his son. As an English speaker, I really like the language in this movie. The movie is full of English words and there is no accent, which I like. I also like that the movie is about a love story and not about a political ideology. The story of the movie is a good story and the actors did a good job. I think that the music is great, too. It is the best piece of music I have ever heard. I hope that this movie will win the best movie Oscar. It deserves it!

Jerry C. photo
Jerry C.

I saw the first one a few years ago and was thoroughly impressed with it. Then came "Cyrano", and it really blew me away. The characters were so authentic and the story was so gripping. Now I finally saw the third installment of the "Cyrano" trilogy, and I am still very impressed with it. The third film is far superior to the first two. The plot is much deeper, and it shows the growing love between the characters as well as the changing relationships between them. I don't want to give too much away because I don't want to spoil the story for you. But it is a great movie, and I think you should go out and watch it if you haven't yet.

Ashley Kim photo
Ashley Kim

This is a good film, very well acted and well directed. It is not really a fairytale, though the elements of its tale are indeed believable. To be honest I didn't find the acting very believable - most of the cast are over-rated and not that convincing - but it is quite a good film overall. I could not see a single flaw in it and I liked it very much. The actors do their best, but they are not the most outstanding. The story is simply fantastic - how it came to be written and how it was told is fascinating and engaging, and the atmosphere, editing and the sets are amazing. The whole cast is brilliant, with excellent performances from all the players. I am sure there will be a sequel, as the plot of the film is actually quite fantastic.

Justin R. photo
Justin R.

When I first heard that this film was coming out, I was really excited. It was a movie I'd wanted to see for a long time. I mean, I haven't seen the "Escape from L.A." trilogy, so it was a little different. What I saw today, however, was nothing new. The characters are not developed enough, and the film never really goes anywhere. It's a really boring film, and the dialogue is really bad. I think it would have been more interesting to have seen someone else's interpretation of the film. I also didn't like the fact that there were a lot of characters that weren't really explained at all. For example, they don't explain why Philippe isn't just an ordinary French doctor. It makes no sense. He has a doctorate, so he could have probably done it. They also don't explain why Marie goes out to find this black man in the first place, but they never explain why she never tells the police or why she lets him stay in the house, or what she did to get him to come. And the police never explain why the two kids are taking him to the police station. The script also doesn't explain the main character's motivations for all of his actions, nor why he really thinks they're funny. You could say that the film is a disappointment, but it's still a very good film, and definitely worth seeing. If you like films that aren't serious, you should definitely give this one a try. I give this film a 7/10.

Marilyn H. photo
Marilyn H.

The film is worth watching because of its cast. Alan Rickman as Bercot is a revelation, especially considering his past work. William H. Macy is a great actor and a strong support to Rickman's performance. The film is a clever and charming adaptation of a novel. The film does not waste its time with some of the silly material and is not too long. The performances of the cast are wonderful. The film is very enjoyable and full of energy. The film is based on a classic book, so there is a certain amount of familiarity that is present. The film is great to watch and is one of the best films of the year.

Bruce Little photo
Bruce Little

Although I've seen this film many times, I still cannot remember a single scene. I still can't remember what the plot is. But I do remember one scene. That scene is where a boy is punished for bringing his father's gold to a church and he is forced to go to school. I was not disappointed. This is a great film. I've seen it twice. And I'm sure it will be a good film for a second time. I really recommend this film.

Eric H. photo
Eric H.

I just watched this movie today and I have to say it was quite a disappointment. I was looking forward to seeing this movie for quite a while and was very excited about it. Unfortunately, it was a disappointment. I understand that this movie was supposed to be a tribute to the great Cyrano De Bergerac, but the movie didn't really show any reason why the writer wanted to do this. It's kind of a waste of time to watch the movie because you can't really get to know the characters or learn anything about them. I'm not saying that the characters are bad, because they are not. But it just doesn't show how much this man meant to so many people. I understand that it's supposed to be a tribute to Cyrano De Bergerac, but it really isn't a tribute to the man. I felt that the movie could have been a lot better. There was no reason for the story to be in that order, especially when there is a movie called "Cyrano de Bergerac" about a whole other time period. It was just really disappointing.