Anschauen Grass


Grass is a movie starring Min-hee Kim, Joobong Kee, and Jae-hong Ahn. In a small Café, Min-hee Kim plays a guest who prefers to observe but not interact with the other guests herself.

Other Titles
Pul-ip-deul, 草の葉, Trawa
Running Time
1 hours 6 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Sang-soo Hong
Sang-soo Hong
Jae-hong Ahn, Jin-young Jung, Min-hee Kim, Joobong Kee
South Korea
Audio Languages
Deutsch, English, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

In a small Café, Min-hee Kim plays a guest who prefers to observe but not interact with the other guests herself.

Comments about drama «Grass» (22)

Raymond Bates photo
Raymond Bates

The movie, in its original form, did not leave me with a warm feeling, but was a bit dull. I saw it a couple of times, and didn't get bored of it. When I saw the movie for the first time, I had no idea what to expect, but the movie is a good one, and you might like it more if you have seen the first film. The actors were great. I would recommend this movie to anybody who likes a movie that is slow, but have a good story to back it up.

Donald B. photo
Donald B.

Grass was written and directed by Sara Weiss. Her feature debut is a dark drama about a mother and her teenage son who are suffering from a medical condition. The mother is a widow with a rebellious son who refuses to conform to the way of life of the wealthy family. The son has a medical condition that makes it difficult for him to speak and that of course makes his mother angry. The mother is a hopeless case and her behavior becomes increasingly frustrating. Weiss's script is full of humor and she directs it in a good way. She has some great moments in the movie. I especially liked her scene where she and the family are in a playground playing basketball and the mother calls her son's name and she says, "I can't speak to you because your voice is too loud." It's a very cute scene. In my opinion, she is a very talented young woman. The only problem I have with her is that she is way too young to direct. She's a bit too young to direct. She can't direct because she's too young. I think she should direct in her late 20s. It's a good film, but not great. The whole plot is very simple. It's a mother and her teenage son who have a medical condition that makes them very ill. The mother has a secret that makes her act in a certain way and the son wants to have a normal life. I don't think that the father is that responsible for the son's condition. It's the mother who is the main person who is responsible for the son's condition. In my opinion, that's not a good thing. I don't think that she should be the main character. That's the problem I have with her. Overall, it's a good film. I think that it is worth watching. I recommend it.

Eugene Newman photo
Eugene Newman

First of all I want to say that I'm not a fan of screenplays that have this feeling that you can see the end in the beginning. You see the beginning and end. That's not the case here. The start is slow but it doesn't matter. The only thing that should bother you is that the beginning is very slow. The problem is that this slow start is not only boring, but the screenplay and the dialogue are not that strong. This is not a problem of the movie, it's a problem of the writing. I didn't understand a single word, which I know is a very difficult thing for a movie. I don't know how much you can expect from a novel but I guess it can't be easy. When I watch a film I don't see the end until the last minute. The ending is something I look for, the most important thing. The problem here is that you don't have that. It's just that there's no climax, just an opening that will not come again. And when it does come, you're not sure what's going on. I'm not saying that this is a bad thing. It's not. It's just that the script is not that strong. And what I'm saying is that this is not a movie that you should be expecting much from. I'm not sure how many people are going to see this, and if it's a good movie or not. It's a movie that you shouldn't watch if you have something better to do.

Lisa Henry photo
Lisa Henry

I can't remember the last time I have seen a film that so thoroughly spoke to me about the relationships of family and the sometimes harsh and mean world that surrounds us. I won't say more about the film, I will only say that I was moved to tears and I felt I was seeing a true story unfold. The performances are absolutely fantastic and I would recommend this film to anyone. I'm not going to tell you how to feel, but I can say that this is a film that will definitely stay with you. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.

Emma photo

In the same way as Woody Allen's wife and kids are not with him in real life, this movie presents how two grown men can bond over a piece of land. Despite the similarities in their personalities, the two men, John (Charlie Hunnam) and Joseph (Paul Dano) are completely different. At first, Joseph seems very passionate about the idea of owning the land and selling it, but he soon realizes that there are other, more productive ways to spend his time. The movie is more of a character study than a documentary. Although the viewer is drawn into the story, it is a character study. The viewer is continually reminded that these two men are men of their own making and not part of the American Dream. While the ending is a bit predictable, the movie is worth the watch. It is not necessarily a must see movie, but it is an interesting story that deserves to be seen.

Patricia photo

I just saw this movie tonight and was somewhat disappointed. A somewhat intelligent movie with a lot of heart, but it seemed to be trying to be too intelligent and too much about the real world. I thought the characters were interesting, but they were forced into these roles. It was nice to see some British actors in a movie like this. I thought it was very well done and I was glad to see them in it. I would have liked it if they had not given the last scene to the first guy. I think that would have added some suspense and a little more mystery. I do agree that it was not a movie I would have wanted to go to the movies for.

Ethan M. photo
Ethan M.

What if a 50's TV pilot were to become a movie, and a TV pilot was to become a movie? This is one of those situations. It has a premise which was incredibly cool, and it was written in such a way that the director made a unique film that made a nice bit of difference. For a genre that is saturated with far too many cookie-cutter films, this one was unique, interesting, and one of the best films I have seen in a long time. There are some flaws to this film that are very noticeable. The movie is very long. It starts off very slow, and it could have easily been shortened. The ending of the film was very good, but it felt like it was too rushed. The movie does take a bit of time to get going, but it was still good. The acting in this movie is really good. The acting from all of the cast members was very good. The acting was very well done and gave the movie a sense of realism and reality. The movie has a strong cast of characters, and their roles are well done. All of the characters were very well done and developed. This movie had a good story and a strong cast of characters, but it could have been much better if it could have been more streamlined and moved a little faster. All in all, it was a very good film that had a great cast, but it could have been much better. The director was able to make a good film that was very unique and had a strong story, but could have been better if it was a little bit faster.

Maria photo

This is a beautiful film, not so much for the look of the cinematography but for the way it unfolds. It is not just about the story, but about the feelings of the characters. The characters are not simple. They are not just archetypes of "good" or "bad". They are complex. I think it is the kind of movie that you can watch with a friend, with your parents, without having to think too much about it, and you will find something in it that you will love.

Ryan Curtis photo
Ryan Curtis

Forget the "pig's ear" reference. This is a very good movie. The story is interesting and the characters are very likable. The acting is first rate. Although, some of the actors (especially the wife) seem to be getting a bit tired, and the "buddy" is not too much of a convincing bad guy. However, this is not a movie for children. I would say that the movie would be suitable for anyone who is interested in the nature of the relationship between a father and his son. It is a story of friendship, which is what is needed to make a movie about this topic.

Arthur photo

This is a movie that would have been perfect for the late '60's, which had plenty of that type of thing going on, but somehow, it's somehow dated, and therefore it doesn't quite work for me. The story, I'm guessing, was originally written for a TV show. It's not exactly original, though. The characters, in their usual old-fashioned fashion, are just cardboard cutouts. There are a few interesting things about the movie. The scenes in the theater where the characters watch a film in front of a "screen" are very good. The cinematography is superb. The production design is pretty good. The costumes, as always, are good. The production value is good. The acting is not bad, though. I really liked "The Artist." I also really liked "Pulp Fiction." "The Shawshank Redemption" is one of my favorite movies. But this is not one of them. It's not great, and it's not bad. It's just a mediocre movie. I'm giving it a 7 because I really enjoyed it, and because it was a movie I didn't see coming, and because it's not a waste of time.

Christina L. photo
Christina L.

Went to see this film in a small theatre. The plot is of course very predictable, but it does the job in conveying the message of the film, and does not sacrifice the fun in the process. The performances of all the actors are very good, and the film is very well shot. The characters are believable, and it is well-acted throughout. The cinematography is good, and the music is very good. It is a very entertaining film. If you have the opportunity to see this film, I strongly recommend it. I gave it a 7 out of 10.

Jessica D. photo
Jessica D.

I've read some negative comments here and I was shocked that the movie got such low ratings, this is the best movie I have ever seen. It's a great story of two boys. The first half of the movie is about the family who is killed by the rioters. The family's daughter, the mother, and her son are being beaten up by the rioters. Then we see the boy who is a kind of guardian angel to the family. It is a great story about a family, and how the child can save his family. It's a good movie. 7/10.

George S. photo
George S.

Yes, this is the kind of movie that makes you wonder if you really understand the points it's trying to make. If you can understand the films main idea, then you will get a lot out of it. If not, you will probably just be confused and feel bad for not understanding the main point. I guess I didn't understand it that well. But, I enjoyed it anyway. There were a few moments where I thought to myself, "Man, that was a long scene." It was really intense and kept my attention. The acting was pretty good and I liked how they showed the people's emotions. The acting in this movie is a bit out of control at times, but it's worth it. They had a great atmosphere to it and the dialogues were good too. It's a pretty good movie, but it might not be for everyone. If you can get through the first hour, then I recommend it. Otherwise, you might just end up hating it.

Jeremy H. photo
Jeremy H.

A friend of mine brought me this movie on DVD and said it was great. I was so disappointed. The first 45 minutes of this movie is one of the worst scenes in the history of cinema. You see two friends who are about to go out for a walk on a quiet Sunday afternoon and they are stopped by the police for a minor traffic violation. They then make an excuse that they are going to make a movie and are going to keep silent. They then go to the police station and show them the finished movie. They are arrested and questioned by the police. They are then given a choice to leave the movie or get arrested for the traffic violation. They then spend the next 45 minutes in jail. The movie is one of those movies that is so bad it is good. It is not a movie that is worth watching but it is worth a few laughs. I think that is what you should do when you are watching this movie. The only thing I liked about the movie was the music. It was really good. It is not the greatest movie but it is not the worst either. It is a good movie to watch when you are feeling down or if you are just tired of movies that are boring.

Julie photo

I recently purchased this movie on DVD for the sole purpose of watching it. It is such a nice movie. The movie is a little bit slow, but it is always worth watching. My family and I have watched it 3 times already. It is worth every second. The film is not perfect. I don't want to say too much about the plot, because I don't want to spoil the movie for anyone who hasn't seen it. However, the plot is very good, and there are plenty of twists and turns. My only problem is the ending, but it's a minor one. All in all, it is a movie that I would definitely recommend to anyone who likes romantic movies.

Eugene B. photo
Eugene B.

The title of the movie is very appropriate. The movie is a must watch for people who like to watch a movie about life in a small town. The story revolves around two young men who are out for revenge and see a beautiful woman in a strange town. The townspeople are really different from what they are in the movies. It is also nice to see the story of a man who is tired of being a hero, but decides to be one. The movie is good, but the main thing is that it is not the best movie you will ever see. The story is not that good, and it is not realistic. The movie is very slow and it takes a long time to get to the point. The only thing that the movie does is give a different perspective of the small town in Pennsylvania. It is a great movie, but I don't recommend it for everyone. You should definitely watch the movie, but it is not that good.

Joshua Thompson photo
Joshua Thompson

There is a significant amount of violence in this film. There are also some sex scenes. I believe the sexual content could be a turn off to some. I feel this is a great film and would recommend it. I would suggest a second viewing. The character of Samantha is incredibly well acted by her. She was also very beautiful in this film. There is also an impressive amount of nudity in this film. I feel this is a great film to see if you enjoy an amazing cast and a unique plot.

Christian photo

This film is a pleasant surprise, because it is a well-written, well-acted, well-directed film. It does a lot of things right, and does them well. It's a movie that could be repeated many times, and each time it would be better. However, it is one of those movies where, if you don't like it, you can just forget about it, because you know what to expect. It is not a great movie, but it is well-made. The two main characters, Shane (Will Patton) and Dina (Anaia de la Fuente), are both very believable, and the rest of the cast is good, too. If you are in the mood for a good film, give this one a chance.

Richard photo

I don't get it. The director and writer of this movie have been involved in the screenwriting of a couple of other films, including "After the Sunset" (1996) and "What's the Matter with Helen?" (1999). The film is a commentary on racism, in particular, and it is pretty clever. The film has an interesting story line and is well acted. I was never bored with it. The only real problem I had with the film was that I was confused as to why the guy's son (played by Jeremy Piven) would do something like this. I guess the director had a message for his audience. That is the only thing that bothered me about the film. I also found the ending to be somewhat disappointing. The only thing that kept me from giving this movie a higher rating was that I never found out why the guy's son was the way he was. All in all, I enjoyed this film and I think the director and writer did a good job. I give this film a 7 out of 10.

Ethan M. photo
Ethan M.

I had no idea what to expect when I saw this film and it's a good thing I did. It's a slow film that's not that fast paced and is full of depth and character development. It's not going to be the best film you see but I really enjoyed it. The cinematography and scenery is beautiful and the acting is great. The story is interesting and the characters are not stereotypes. There are many things to think about in the movie. You might not like it but you won't be bored. I give this film a 7 out of 10.

Jose Patel photo
Jose Patel

The film is set in America in the 1940s. The son of a veteran of the war with his mother being deported back to Poland. She is pregnant. Her husband has come back to America to marry his daughter who is from Poland. The mother and her son are living in a building in Chicago and trying to be part of their family. The mother has an American mother and a Polish father. Her son is on the outside looking in and the mother trying to adapt to a new life. The story is told with great empathy and the performances are very good. It is a good story.

Margaret photo

This movie is very well done, even though it is very slow in the beginning. I feel that the movie did not really give much of a sense of what it was going to be about, but it did go with the story very well. The story of the story is about a young man who is a part of a movement to change the way people think about the world, and it is about how his character changes throughout the movie. I thought that the acting was very good, and the story was very interesting. I think that this movie is really a great example of what can be done with a movie that is a little slow in the beginning, and really has a good story. I give this movie a 7 out of 10.