Anschauen Napszállta


Napszállta is a movie starring Vlad Ivanov, Evelin Dobos, and Susanne Wuest. A young girl grows up to become a strong and fearless woman in Budapest before World War I.

Other Titles
Tramonto, 日暮, Budapestin auringonlasku, Solnedgang i Budapest, Zaton, Atardecer, Gün Batımı, Sunset, Anoitecer, Suton, Δύση ηλίου, Entardecer, Atardecer (Sunset), サンセット, Schyłek dnia, Apusul, Sunset - La fin du jour
Running Time
2 hours 22 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Mystery, Drama
László Nemes
László Nemes, Clara Royer, Matthieu Taponier
Vlad Ivanov, Susanne Wuest, Björn Freiberg, Evelin Dobos
Hungary, France
Audio Languages
Deutsch, English, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

1913, Budapest, in the heart of Europe. The young Irisz Leiter arrives in the Hungarian capital with high hopes to work as a milliner at the legendary hat store that belonged to her late parents. She is nonetheless sent away by the new owner, Oszkár Brill. While preparations are under way at the Leiter hat store, to host guests of uttermost importance, a man abruptly comes to Irisz, looking for a certain Kálmán Leiter. Refusing to leave the city, the young woman follows Kálmán's tracks, her only link to a lost past. Her quest brings her through the dark streets of Budapest, where only the Leiter hat store shines, into the turmoil of a civilization on the eve of its downfall.

Comments about mystery «Napszállta» (19)

Jeremy R. photo
Jeremy R.

Yes I have seen this film over 25 times. It is a very intelligent and provocative film. It has become one of my favourite films. The actors are excellent, but this film was not made to make their performance look good. It was made to show how bad the world is. There is a very strong message at the end of this film. This is a brilliant film. It is extremely well-written. The direction is very well-made, and the photography is beautiful. The film was made in 1980 and it was banned because it was a "hard" film. In my opinion, this film is very important, and I would recommend it to anyone.

Tiffany Curtis photo
Tiffany Curtis

I guess the best way to describe this film is: highly entertaining. The acting is excellent. Even though it's a little bit slow at the beginning, the plot is surprisingly good. It's about a Hungarian/Russian girl (the main character) who is in a meeting with a Russian man (the main character's brother). She tells him that he has to get a plane ticket back to Russia, so she can marry him and take him to New York. The Russian says he's fine with that. He takes off without saying a word. But the Hungarian is so mad at him that she doesn't want him to go. After a while, the Hungarian comes back to her and says she thinks he has gone to Russia. She says she'll go with him, but then says she'll never see him again. But the Russian is very much into her, so he agrees to go to New York with her. So the next day, the Hungarian goes to meet the Russian man, and he is very happy to see her. So the main character stays with him and tries to keep him from going back to Russia. But in the end, he's not so happy with the Hungarian. She gives him a hard time and he doesn't like her. So the main character says he'll be leaving. She says goodbye and they just walk away. They kiss. But she goes to meet a Russian man, who has the same name as the one she met the first time. She tells him that she will never see him again, but he doesn't say anything. So they walk off, and the main character tells the main character that she just said goodbye to him and he kissed her. Then the main character takes off with the Russian man to New York. But the main character says goodbye to the Russian man and he says goodbye to her. She walks off, leaving the Russian man. The main character meets the main character's brother in Moscow. He has to go to a meeting. He goes to a reception. He comes back, sees the main character, kisses the main character. They say good-bye. She goes to a dinner with a Russian man. She goes back to New York, and the main character comes to her place. She says goodbye to him, and they kiss. They walk off. The main character meets the main character's brother in New York. They go to the Russian place, they kiss, they go to a meeting. The main character walks off and the main

Cheryl photo

Many movies that may be considered to be the beginning of a whole genre of movies, like Godfather, Pulp Fiction, or the Godfather Part II are classic examples of how well done, where the directors learned how to get the audience involved and able to understand everything that was going on. The look of the movie is amazing, from the lighting to the acting. I can see why people would love it. It's the perfect example of what should be an example of how to create a movie in an entertaining way. The movies should have lots of action, great characters, a lot of attention to detail, and excellent acting. That's what this movie has. The action is great, the plot is brilliant, the characters are likable, the story is wonderful, and the acting is the best I've ever seen. As you see in the movies, the acting is often underused, it is not emphasized. I would love to see more movies like this. I think it's going to be quite a while before a good movie is made that actually wants to be a classic like this one.

Juan photo

A great movie, a movie that I have watched many times, and never gets old. The music is amazing, the photography, the actors, everything is just perfect. The movie is not perfect, but it is perfect. It is very powerful and touching, it is the best movie of all times. It is about a family that is trying to get the best of their lives, and the problems they face. The story is very powerful and the acting is just perfect. The music is also amazing. I highly recommend this movie, I give it a 10/10.

Zachary F. photo
Zachary F.

I have to say that I am pleasantly surprised by this film, and that it is very good indeed. It is quite the evolution of a small story by Balint Szalay, but is just a little bit too long and a little bit too much. The plot is a little bit like that of a soap opera and it is a little bit unrealistic in some parts. The actors are decent, especially the Hungarian actor playing the lover of the doctor. A good movie, with an excellent performance by József Jurgens. But it is not the first Hungarian movie I have seen and I am not really familiar with it. So I think that you will find it better if you have watched a Hungarian movie before, I have seen quite a few Hungarian movies before. 7/10

Jose photo

By introducing a difficult, and at times, disturbing subject, such as the Polish genocide, "Memories of Riga" manages to leave viewers with many questions to ponder about the movie. The movie is based on the memoirs of an American veteran of the Polish army who was involved in the massacre at Czestochowa. In the film, director Szabadsag and his team provide the viewer with the insights and insights on the characters involved in the massacre as well as the emotions that came with the massacre and what was lost by all of them. The screenwriter of the film did a very good job in the telling of the story and managed to get the viewers involved in the story. However, it was the performances that was the strong point of the movie, and that is a major reason for the 7 stars. Tereza Priebe, who plays the character of Ondrej Poddek, was excellent in her role as a survivor of the massacre. Her performance brought a sense of pain to viewers as she expresses it through her body language and body language alone. Dina Waldemar Wisniewski, who plays the character of Rosa, also did an excellent job in her performance. Both of them displayed great talent to bring a powerful performance to the screen and also their strong acting skills. I do have some criticisms for the movie, namely the unnecessary use of the flashbacks, which is a major flaw in the film. It is definitely a major flaw that makes the film feel a little shorter than it should. I also would have liked to see more depth in the flashbacks in the movie and I would have enjoyed to see the different characters react to the flashbacks. Overall, the movie was an excellent and must see movie. The movie was very informative and the acting was excellent. The movie managed to tell the story and leaves the audience with many questions to ponder about the movie. Overall, I would recommend the movie to those who want to see a very interesting and must see movie.

Gloria T. photo
Gloria T.

A very interesting and not very known film about a remarkable man who in this year of his 50th year became a living ghost. The main character, Simon Wiesenthal, is a German Jewish human rights activist, researcher, and leader of the Austrian-American Institute. The film is based on a book written by the director and based on the life of Simon Wiesenthal. The movie is a very long film, sometimes you feel that the director did not have a clear idea of the story but this is not the case because the director did not want to tell the story in a few scenes. The film is structured so that the events of the film are interconnected and the audience is able to follow the story at the same time. The film shows the life of Simon Wiesenthal from his childhood to his death. The film is very realistic in its narrative. The film is also very sad in the sense that there is a feeling of betrayal, of betrayal of the people and especially of the Jewish people. Also the film shows the fear of a people that has been betrayed by the leaders of the country and also the fear of the countries that are suspected of supporting Nazism. The film also shows the struggle of the people, in which the children of the school where Simon Wiesenthal was killed played a very important role. A large part of the film is based on the experiences of Simon Wiesenthal and some of the people who know him. The film shows the best of what Simon Wiesenthal accomplished and the worst of his personality. The film shows the problem of the people who were killed by Simon Wiesenthal, of the people who know him and of the people who love him. The film also shows the strength of the Jewish people and the weakness of the leaders of the countries that supported the Nazis. In the end of the film there is a very strong sense of a victory and a victory that has been won, the victory over Nazism.

Justin Hicks photo
Justin Hicks

I was in the mood for a movie with a lot of symbolism and a lot of symbolism, so I bought the DVD. I was surprised to see that there was a lot of symbolism, but I could see that the director had to be a little bit lazy and he didn't go deep into the symbolism. I found the movie to be a bit slow and boring, but I didn't find the symbolism to be that strong. I guess I was expecting more than what I got. The acting was good, but the plot was weak and there was no real tension. The movie was a bit slow and boring, but I was still able to enjoy it. I would recommend this movie to people who are into the symbolism, but it was not that great.

Christine photo

I found this movie to be a complete thriller and I have to say that it was very well done. I like the way the plot is portrayed. It's a sad story, but also a fascinating one. When I read the book, I was afraid that it was going to be a depressing story, and I really was disappointed. I still think that the movie is the best in the book.

Shirley G. photo
Shirley G.

Filmmaker Kathryn Hahn's version of the 1967 "The Never Ending Story" story is still the one to watch in this year's Oscar season. It's a modern take on the story that captures the spirit of the story and the spirit of its creator, Irwin Allen, who knew he could adapt the story but didn't know how to do so. With a very limited budget, Hahn has made a compelling film that captures the essence of the story but, for all the wrong reasons. This is a film of unfulfilled dreams. Henry (Matt Damon) is a middle-aged, unsuccessful actor who is having a great time, but his life is a mess. A large part of his life is spent in his father's home, where he is the only one of his generation to attend. Henry loves his father but he is unable to connect with him because he doesn't know him well. When he meets an older woman, he falls in love with her and helps her with her mortgage. But when she finds out she is going to have a baby, she plans to have the baby with Henry. Henry's life is going to change, and a part of him must leave the life he knows. The story is a long one and, if you are going to watch it, then you have to take it in. The ending is somewhat predictable but, even though it is, there is no ambiguity in the end. The narrative is short and the characters are not really defined. There are some interesting characters but, in the end, the story comes down to one man and one woman, the only real character to define. The relationship between Henry and his father is perhaps the only defining moment in the film. It is fascinating to see how this film does not really try to answer any questions about the story, because it doesn't. The film is driven by the actors, who are great, especially Matt Damon who gives one of his best performances. If there is any actor who is at fault here, it is Hahn, who is not given enough material to work with. The lack of a clear story and the lack of a clear conclusion, have made the film hard to sit through and makes the film feel a little disjointed. It is in places very repetitive, and a bit disjointed. It is a good film, but, as a film, it is far from great. It is one of the most interesting films of the year, but, on its own,

Timothy Watson photo
Timothy Watson

Saw this movie in the cinema and was very impressed. The acting is excellent and the storyline is very well done. The movie is about a young woman named Anek who is a journalist. She has been working for a magazine in Hungary. One day her editor is killed in an accident and she is thrown into a psychiatric hospital. She is now the only journalist who is not married and she has to decide whether to stay there or go back to her magazine. The story is very interesting and it is very interesting to see how Anek deals with the situation. I think that the movie is a little bit too long but it is a good movie nonetheless.

Madison Alvarado photo
Madison Alvarado

I watched this movie the other day and it made me laugh. I was fascinated by the script and the actors. The story is quite gripping and the movie is quite well-made. The actors portray the real characters in the movie. I would recommend this movie for a nice weekend night with the family. It is a good movie that brings back memories. I recommend watching this movie.

Harold H. photo
Harold H.

In the seventies, Czechoslovakia and Poland were the most stable communist countries in Europe. In the late seventies, the former was in an economic crisis, and Poland was in a communist state. During this time, the military coup d'etat of August 1944 took place. When the Czarist army defeated the resistance of the Czech resistance in Budapest, a huge, nasty war started between the victorious army and the German army, who was supporting the republic of Hungary. The German occupation of Czechoslovakia was one of the defining events of the 20th century. The aim of the war was the destruction of the German troops, but the war also transformed the Czech resistance into a fighting force. The war was in many ways a success for the Germans. The defeat of the German army in Prague was one of the major achievements of the Nazi army. The survivors of the Prague resistance managed to live in the suburbs of the capital, which were the main centers of the resistance movement. However, the Czech resistance was crippled by a brutal bureaucracy and by the fact that the government was corrupt. It was also in the hands of a huge and ruthless Nazi army, which, during the war, led a ruthless campaign against all the German civilians, especially the women, and the resistance was weak. The resistance was not only an effective fighting force, but it also acted as a moral force. The resistance movement believed that the spirit of the people was important for all the Germans who lost their lives in the war. This explains the slogan, "Never again, we don't care about your women and children." When the war ended, the German forces had to retreat to the west, and the country was divided into two parts: Czechoslovakia and Nazi-occupied Poland. The new German government was led by Adolf Hitler, who had been elected Chancellor of Germany. It was a complete victory of the Nazi party, whose main goal was the destruction of the former Republic of Czechoslovakia. The new German government was convinced that the victory of the German army was inevitable. The German government was responsible for the downfall of the old government, which had been the second democratic government of the world after the United States of America. After the defeat of the resistance in Prague, Hitler came to power. He used the resistance movement for his personal interests. He needed a strong strong army, so he started the war against Czechoslovakia. Hitler's slogan, "The Third Reich is eternal", was a slogan which was also a justification

Stephanie C. photo
Stephanie C.

I do not agree with the negative comments on this movie, the two major issues I have with it are that it goes on too long, and that there are too many characters in the movie. The main character could have been two, and the plot is very good, but the acting is not very good, and the characters are not as interesting as in other movies. I think this is very good in a movie like this, so I would say you should watch the movie, and also maybe you should watch the movie again, you may like it more. The movie is good, but I would say it's not as good as many say it is. The movie is very good, but it could have been even better. It's not as good as A Little Princess, but I think it's better than Brother Bear, which is a very good movie. The movie is not as good as The Polar Express, but it's still pretty good. I give this movie a 7/10. The movie is not that great, but it's still pretty good.

Jacob W. photo
Jacob W.

The film is based on a play by Yossi Arad and the film itself is a story about one man's descent into madness. The film is very strong and shows the amazing performances of the actors. The story is well written, the way the story is told is amazing. The main character is not shown much and you just have to feel the pain of his soul. The direction is perfect, the cast is amazing and you just have to watch it. It's amazing.

Terry photo

I've read the first book and I can see why this was not to be a straight adaptation of the book. I don't know what the director wanted to do with it. Was he trying to be a different film, or was he trying to capture the essence of the story? I know I'm not the target audience, but I was watching this film with my friend and he liked it. I really liked it. I would love to see a film that is faithful to the book, but I understand the problem. There are other films out there that do this. I think the movie itself was good. It was a bit long, and it did drag on a bit, but it's good film that kept my attention. The cinematography was beautiful and the acting was good. I liked all the characters, and I especially liked the lawyer, Vladek. I think the scenes with him were very moving. I would have liked it a bit more if the story was a bit more straight, but overall it was very good. 7/10

Bruce Weber photo
Bruce Weber

The film follows two brothers as they struggle with their father's death. Father was an alcoholic, who went on to self-destruct on the night before he died. They are always trying to make their dad happy and in the process, their mother is suffering from dementia. The director tries to show the emotional effect of the father's death on the brothers as well as his death. They do their best to be nice to their father, but they do not realize that their father will never forgive them for being weak. I would recommend this film for anyone who has experienced the tragic events that our family went through.

Kathy photo

The first time I watched this movie I thought that it was a good movie. After watching it a few more times I realized that this movie is so much better than I thought. The acting is great, the story is great, the direction is great. I really liked how they portrayed the life of a couple in the middle of nowhere. The movie is very well made. The characters are believable, the setting is very realistic, and the music is great. I have watched this movie a few times now and I still find it so entertaining. It is a good movie that I would recommend to anyone. The only thing that I would like to say is that there is a scene that I felt was a little bit rushed and it made me a little bit angry. But, I think it was just a little bit of editing. Overall, this movie is very well made and very entertaining. I highly recommend this movie to anyone who likes movies that are realistic, and also like movies that are about a couple in the middle of nowhere. I give this movie a 10/10.

Lauren photo

As the world's most celebrated writer, one would think that this film would be a masterpiece. Instead, it is a movie that is well worth seeing if only for the performance of the lead actor, which is at once compelling and sympathetic. The movie is also a great example of how to make a movie that is both realistic and fictional. The director has created a realistic film that is set in the middle of a Hungarian winter, and yet manages to make it believable. The characters in the movie are believable, but also interesting. The cinematography is excellent, and the score is excellent. I have never seen such a well done movie about the Hungarian writer, and I have seen some very good movies in my life, but this is one of the best.