Anschauen Trial by Fire

Trial by Fire

Trial by Fire is a movie starring Jack O'Connell, Laura Dern, and Emily Meade. The tragic and controversial story of Cameron Todd Willingham, who was executed in Texas for killing his three children after scientific evidence and...

Other Titles
Chrzest ogniem, Feuerprobe die wichtigsten Beweise, El caso Willingham, Justiça Em Chamas
Running Time
2 hours 7 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Biography, Drama
Director
Edward Zwick
Writer
Geoffrey Fletcher, David Grann
Actors
Emily Meade, Jack O'Connell, Laura Dern, Chris Coy
Country
USA
Year
2018
Audio Languages
Deutsch, English, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

The film takes place in Texas. Cameron Todd Willingham is accused of triple killing of his children killed in a fire. The man denies his guilt and claims that he loved his daughters more than life. However, the court sentenced him to death. For eight long years, Cameron has been on death row, and soon he will be executed. His business is interested by Elizabeth Gilbert, who all her life leads an implacable struggle with the system.

Comments about biography «Trial by Fire» (21)

Justin photo
Justin

In this film we see the personal relationship between a young boy who wants to be a footballer and his father. He has a serious father problem, who tries to isolate him from the world. He does not want to see him in his football uniform and is determined to have his son playing football, which is why he leaves his home to the football academy. He is driven to learn football, and to see his son in the game, but we see that he wants to keep his son in school, which makes it impossible to have him playing the game. He decides to try to have the father talk to the coach, but this will not work. The coach does not have the answer to the problem. So he decides to find a way to help the father to be a better father and to see his son play football. The father finds his own way to try to help his son, but he does not know how to do this. The father tries to help his son in school, but this does not help. He finds the right solution in the way he tells the coach that he wants to see his son play football, but the coach refuses to give the father the chance to do this. Finally, the father tries to get his son to see football in the real way, which he does not know how to do, and which is very difficult for him. In the end, we see the father meeting his son's friends at the football academy, and the son is now playing football. The father, who has done a lot of hard work in the past, has given his son a chance to play football, which is very hard for him. This film shows that the relationship between a father and a son is more important than the relationship between a father and a daughter. The father of the son who is playing football is able to do this because the father did not have the opportunity to do so. So he is able to make this son play football. This is a very powerful film, and a very touching film.

Denise B. photo
Denise B.

This is one of the most widely and highly acclaimed films of the year, a true story of a man with a case of PTSD. While not an all-out "save the world" story, it still touches on a lot of personal issues and can be easily adapted to more modern audiences. It's a great look at how a military base can be a hub for some of the darkest times in a person's life, and how someone with PTSD is viewed in society. While this film is not a masterpiece, it is a very well-made movie and I was very surprised at how much I enjoyed it. It is an emotionally engaging story that definitely keeps the viewer's attention. There are some great performances, especially from Robert Duvall as the Vietnam vet and Liam Neeson as the town's law enforcement officer, but the film does suffer a bit from a lack of character development. I think it is more than just the acting that makes the film interesting, but how it develops the story, and how it shows the many sides of the story of a man with PTSD. The film is a lot more about the struggles of the main character than the impact of the events on the other people in his life. Overall, I think it is a good film that I would recommend to people who enjoy a well-made story and don't mind seeing a man with PTSD struggle. 7/10

Robert D. photo
Robert D.

This movie had so many great moments, and was a little depressing. The movie had a great plot and it was a great way to start off the summer. I loved the soundtrack and how it fit with the story. The casting was great. I have to say I think that the best part of the movie was the actors themselves. I think the reason this movie did not get the Oscar nomination it deserved is because it did not have any celebrities in it. The movie has a great message and it was great to see these two actually be a couple. I will definitely be seeing this movie again and will be buying it on DVD. I hope that this movie gets a good review and get a good response. It is a movie that will definitely make you think and it is definitely a movie that will not let you down.

Nancy photo
Nancy

I will begin by saying that this film is a great addition to the "series" of movies based on a book by Michael Crichton. The book itself was a great read, and I have read many of Crichton's books and they are always great. This one was different from other films in the series because it was made as a documentary. This is where the book really shines and the fact that it was filmed in real life is what makes it so great. The acting was not great, but this film definitely has an emphasis on the acting and not the plot. I would recommend this movie to anyone who likes documentaries. A great movie, 7/10

Ralph Banks photo
Ralph Banks

I can't believe the low rating on this movie. The film is well acted and well directed, and it is a great film to watch. It has a nice story, very well written and a good cast. It's a very good story, with some good performances. It is a shame that the film did not get more recognition because it is a very good film. I would recommend it to anyone who likes a good movie.

Christine photo
Christine

This is a movie that doesn't hold up as well as I would have hoped. First, I have to admit that it did keep my attention, with some really good dramatic scenes. The acting was good, even if it was a bit over the top. Second, I would have liked to see more of the love story between the two lead characters. I know it was a big part of the story, but it just seemed to take up more of the time than it should have. Third, the way the movie ended made it a little hard to swallow. I mean, it's a crime movie and we are supposed to be rooting for the guy, but it is so hard to believe that they would do such a thing. Overall, I would say that it was an above average movie, but it was so bad that it made it almost unwatchable for me.

Julia photo
Julia

I will admit that this movie is not perfect. It is a bit overlong at least in the beginning. And I don't think that the film is a "must-see" but it is certainly watchable. A veteran member of the Army gets assigned to a small town for a "guerilla" assignment. The town is running out of gas and there are no gas stations left in town. The veteran in charge gives the town his own station and he starts working the pumps. While the town is having trouble with the gas, the veterans friend gets a call from his boss to get his friend back home. The veterans friend is reluctant to come back. Eventually, he gets the nod and leaves. The veterans friend does a good job as a mentor and the townspeople are glad that he went back to work. As the veterans friend leaves town, the townspeople get a chance to thank him for coming back and they all come out and say a few words to him. After the townspeople get to thank him, the townspeople goes out and thanks the veteran for coming back. There is a lot of subtle things that are touched upon in this movie. It is definitely worth a watch and I would definitely recommend it to anyone. It is definitely worth a look. Grade B-

Douglas Knight photo
Douglas Knight

This movie was shown in Germany on the German language channel "Tastemade", which is shown in English language channels in Germany. The movie is set in the late 50s, during the Cuban Missile Crisis. The story follows the trial of a Cuban refugee, Ricardo (Maurice Bronson) who's illegally crossed the Cuban border and has been hiding in Miami. He is tried in a Cuban prison and sentenced to death, but before he is executed he is found innocent and released. After he has been released he becomes a citizen of Cuba and goes on a journey to find his son who was sent to the Cuban Revolutionaries. The movie is very well done. It is very emotional and shows the situation of a father who is trying to find his son and a refugee who has been illegally sent to the Castro regime. I was very impressed by the acting of the lead actor, Maurice Bronson. He does a great job of making you feel that he is really lost in this situation. The movie is very well directed and directed well. It is very powerful and has a very strong message. It is a very good movie, but it is not perfect. It could have been better, but it is still a good movie.

Gerald Clark photo
Gerald Clark

It's been over 10 years since "Trial by Fire" was released and I'm now 29. I did not know anything about the film before watching it, but I found it interesting, so I decided to watch it. For the most part I was able to follow the plot, and I found the characters engaging. However, there were parts of the film that were extremely disappointing. The most glaring example is the infamous "white people are evil" scene. It seemed to be a combination of a dozen different scenes, all of which were meant to be funny but fell flat on their faces. I also found the "beatles" to be annoying. There was absolutely no attempt to give them a personality. They were all stereotypical and just didn't seem like they were in a film. It seems that the entire plot was to make a big deal about black people being bad, but the movie just failed in that aspect. I believe the biggest problem with the film is the writing. It's bad. It's not funny, it's not intelligent, it's not exciting, and it's just not very well thought out. It is just a bad movie. If you're going to watch it, don't take my word for it. Take some friends over, watch the film, and then come to your own conclusions. Overall, the film is not a complete waste of time, and if you're a fan of Michael Bay, you might enjoy it. However, if you want to watch a film that is interesting and has a plot, I recommend "Black Hawk Down".

Julie H. photo
Julie H.

While I felt this movie was a very well done biopic of Custer, I would have liked it if the movie had focused more on the personalities of the Custer's other two sons. The other two sons are all very strong personalities in their own ways. Custer, however, is really the big personality. The other two sons do not get enough screen time. This is a pity as I think the story of Custer and his men was interesting and well told.

Kathleen L. photo
Kathleen L.

As a fan of all the Bad Boys films, I must admit that I was pretty disappointed with this film. The Bad Boys is a perfect example of what makes a classic film, the characters, the setting, the music, the plot, etc. These elements are all here, and while the film has the same basic storyline as the previous Bad Boys films, it has a completely different style and tone. One of the first things I noticed is that the Bad Boys has a completely different sense of humor. While the first three films were all about "kidnapping a cop", this film is all about "kidnapping the Bad Boys". There is no "kidnapping the Bad Boys" part of the film, and while this may seem odd, the Bad Boys is not a comedy. The humor in this film is dark and sometimes downright depressing. While the movie is very violent, it is not meant to be taken seriously. While it is true that the movie is very violent, I would suggest that you avoid it if you want a good laugh. The actors in the film are all great, with Kevin Hart and Kevin James doing the best work, especially Hart. It is definitely not the best acting, but it is certainly not the worst. The Bad Boys is a great film, and it is definitely worth seeing. It is certainly one of the best films of the year, and I highly recommend that you see it. There are no negatives, and the positives are worth seeing it. A great film, and definitely worth seeing.

Ruth Warren photo
Ruth Warren

I thought this was an interesting film but I don't know that it was an outstanding film. I think it was pretty good. The story was good, and I thought that the acting was good, the film was good. It had a great story, and it was entertaining. I think that it was better than the previous movie, the actor that played the role of Adam was good, and I thought that he was a good actor. The other actors did a good job. I liked this movie, and I think that it was a good movie. It was a good movie.

Doris photo
Doris

The story was interesting, but not really the way I had hoped it would be. But I still have to admit, that I had a good time. This movie had all the elements of a great movie. The acting was great, the direction was good, and the script was very strong. However, this movie had the story told very slowly, and that's a problem for me. The story of this movie is very unique, and I would have liked to have seen it told much more quickly. I also didn't like the way the movie was presented. It was very "artsy" in the way it was done. This movie has a lot of similarities to "A man for all seasons", which I thought was an excellent movie. But this movie had a lot of flaws. It seemed like it was very "fast paced", and not very "slow", and there was not much character development in the movie. I also didn't like how the character of the woman was presented. It was very over the top and very "fairy tale". It was also very "sweet" and "cliche". Overall, this movie is a good movie. I did enjoy it, but it was not the best movie I have ever seen. I recommend this movie to anyone who likes a good movie, or to anyone who likes a great story.

Charles P. photo
Charles P.

This is a story about a couple that has been on death row for over two decades. But there are also clues that show why the original jury was wrong. It was only after they've been on death row for a couple of years, that a new jury was formed. After all of this time, the defense team found out that there is still a chance for the couple to go to the jury. They went to the jury and have the jury hear the evidence. The jury is finally made up of 12 people who were all on death row and all have lived with this past. They decided to have them listen to the evidence and decide what should be done. They decided to let them decide on what they believe to be the true facts about this case. This movie is about how the jury decided that they were wrong about this case. It also shows the point of view of the defense team. It also shows how one person can have so much influence. I recommend this movie because it is a true story. This is a must see movie. I rate it a 7 out of 10.

Andrew H. photo
Andrew H.

The movie was ok, its a movie, no where near the bad acting as a movie should be. I am so sick of people comparing the acting of wimbledon and bad acting to the acting in big bad wolf. the acting is good, and the story is good, there is a lot of love in the movie, but the acting is not as good as the acting in big bad wolf, the movie just had a good ending.

Emily photo
Emily

Trial By Fire is a movie about a man who fought for civil rights and was found guilty of murdering a white police officer. The story of the trial is based on true events and includes real-life interviews with the jury members and their families, along with historical photos. The movie is about how many of the jurors voted for the verdict. I thought it was a good movie, but it was slow and boring. The only good part was the ending.

Angela photo
Angela

There is a line in the movie that goes like this "If you don't feel sorry for someone you've never known, you have no heart". This quote goes to the heart of what makes this movie so great. It is the balance between the true story of a guy who had to take care of a sick mother and her son and the need to show the viewers a side of life that we have to be so afraid of. This movie is based on the true story of Chuck Palahniuk's novel 'The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao'. It also stars Jamie Lee Curtis and Ralph Fiennes. I thought the movie was well done. I felt as though I knew the characters from the book. The acting was good but I didn't feel as though I knew any of them. I thought Fiennes did a great job portraying a man who wasn't a monster but a man who didn't want to be like the people he knew. It's a shame that the movie was so slow moving because it could have been so much more. The movie kept my interest throughout the entire time. I can't wait to see the movie again.

Kelly Robertson photo
Kelly Robertson

This is a story about a group of military men who went into the woods of Maine and tried to make it to the North Pole. They were the last men alive. For the most part this was a very good story, with some very good acting. However, this is an over simplified portrayal of what really happened in the woods. I was surprised to see that this movie actually took place in the woods. The movie did show the characters walking down the woods at night, and at night they did actually camp. In the movie it was said that the team's two leads had only four people left and they were not sure of what to do. This also looked very real, as I was able to see the group in the woods at night and I thought they would be all by themselves. Another thing that didn't really make sense was when the girl was talking to the team leader. Why would they trust the team leader? I thought the two leads were very good actors, and I would love to see them in a movie. However, the movie does have its problems. The story was very short, and I would have liked a few more hours of the movie. I did like the music in the movie, and the special effects were good, but the acting was not good, and the acting was pretty good. I would recommend this movie to fans of military history, or people who enjoy movies about the real thing. 7/10

Sandra photo
Sandra

An honest look at the years of the Beatles in the 40s, showing them at the height of their fame, and how they made it through the 1970s with little or no success. The music, the clothes, the clothes, the clothes. And the music is excellent. Not only does it have the Beatles, but it has the Rolling Stones and the Rolling Stones and all of the other classic rock bands of the time. The story is simple. A man, John Lennon, has a mental breakdown and is sent to an institution. He is there for ten years, but not only is he forced to do things that don't make sense, he is also forced to have lots of "art" done for him. Things like making his clothes and talking to his clothes. In the end, the two of them are reunited. After the death of John Lennon, he is given a great honor: to write the music for the next Beatles movie. The result is an overblown, over the top film. It is full of artistic license. Everything from the set designs to the set pieces is the result of money, and all of the "art" is borrowed from other films. John Lennon is not even allowed to say a single line. But he does his best. The rest of the cast is so full of talent that it is hard to tell who is in it for the money and who is there for the honor. And it is obvious that the people who made this film were also there to make money. In the end, it is just a "film" about a band that made lots of money, and it is not much of a film. It is a very interesting look at a few years in the life of a very famous band, but it is also one of the most overrated films I have ever seen.

Victoria photo
Victoria

Martin Sheen is one of my favorite actors, and he did a fine job in this film. However, it is not one of his best performances. He doesn't have the raw intensity and magnetic personality that we saw in his other films, including "The Morning After", which was directed by Paul Schrader. Although I have not seen his other films, I can see where Sheen was trying to go with the subject. It is a very dark movie, and Sheen doesn't show emotion in his performance. It was very hard to sympathize with the characters in this film. The story line was quite compelling, and I would have liked to have seen more of Sheen's character. The film shows how people with AIDS suffer, and it was an eye-opening experience. I recommend this film, as it is a very good movie, but it is not a must-see.

Donna Rogers photo
Donna Rogers

A very good film. Not a masterpiece but worth watching. A lot of the action was shot from the camera and I think it's better than most action films these days. There are some scenes where the camera zoomed in on something that was in the background of the shot and I thought it was worth it. And I loved that the movie didn't show the whole story, just the main parts. The whole movie was built on the strength of the story. It's not as well written as I would have liked it to be but that was the movie's strength. The music was good too. It was a bit too short in some parts but it was still pretty good. The camera work was great and it's nice to see a movie made from the POV of a trainee on a rail yard. I also liked the look of the movie. There were some good shots of the snowy mountains. This movie is going to get a lot of hate for being a remake. But it was based on the book and it's not like the book was perfect. I would give this movie 7.5/10