Anschauen Bisbee '17

Bisbee '17

Bisbee '17 is a movie starring Mike Anderson, Charles Bethea, and Ken Boe. An old mining town on the Arizona-Mexico border finally reckons with its darkest day: the deportation of 1200 immigrant miners exactly 100 years ago. Locals...

Running Time
1 hours 52 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Western, Documentary
Robert Greene
Mike Anderson, Benjamin Joel Caron, Charles Bethea, Ken Boe
Audio Languages
Deutsch, English, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

An old mining town on the Arizona-Mexico border finally reckons with its darkest day: the deportation of 1200 immigrant miners exactly 100 years ago. Locals collaborate to stage recreations of their controversial past.

Comments about western «Bisbee '17» (21)

Susan H. photo
Susan H.

My rating: * out of *. I believe this is the best documentary film I have seen in quite a long time. It contains, well, every aspect of the cowboy lifestyle: The clothes, the dances, the food, the costumes, the history, the mythology. It also covers the history of the western-animated movies, which made a huge impact on the American psyche. The effects of the western culture are everywhere. It is clearly the most romantic and traditional of all religions, and the most visually pleasing. It was one of the first documentaries to show the modern cowboy, a long time ago. It is also one of the first movies to show the modern southern cowboy, but it is not the only one. There are many. The other characteristics of the cowboy were very interesting. It is a bit slow and somewhat depressing at times, but overall, I would recommend this film to anyone.

Kimberly Larson photo
Kimberly Larson

The "Army of One" is a good example of a documentary that has a lot to say. A film that tells the stories of a group of ordinary people who were involved in the civil rights movement in the 50s. A group of actors who play the characters of their lives in their own words, so that you can see that they were not really heroes, but just people trying to do what they believed was right. The images that are taken of the army are amazing. Even more amazing are the stories of those who fought with the army. The acting is great. The music is superb. The script is so moving that it can move you to tears, and the photography and sound are amazing. This film is a must see.

Craig photo

This movie takes a look at the late 1800's and the early 1900's. It's not about the end of the Civil War, it's about how people deal with that and how people reacted. The focus is on the west, the "big three" that everyone talks about: the United States, Mexico and the Wild West. What I liked about this film is that it isn't like a lot of the "History" documentaries that are out there. It doesn't have a specific point to make or anything. It's just a look into a time that really affected people, and has been, for centuries. I think this is a really good movie for everyone, whether you are a Civil War buff or not.

Tiffany Elliott photo
Tiffany Elliott

I watched this film in its entirety on a flight out of the state of California. This was, for me, the best film of the year. It was great to see the war being depicted in a unique, yet realistic way. The film itself is a character driven film and the actors in the film are some of the best I have ever seen. I have enjoyed the experience of watching this film and I will definitely be purchasing the DVD when it is available.

Aaron photo

When I first heard about this film, I wasn't sure if it was a good film, but the more I thought about it, the more I enjoyed it. The movie is shot with a hand held camera and uses mostly outdoor locations, and the characters and the landscape are all beautiful. The first half of the film is taken in a small town in Wyoming, which is very beautiful. The second half of the film follows the men through the Wyoming desert. The only problem with the second half is that the film is too long. If the first half was a little more descriptive of the desert and the men's lives, I would have enjoyed this film more. Overall, the second half is a nice story of the men and their lives in the Wyoming desert, and the stories of their stories. If you love the outdoors, I recommend this film.

Jean H. photo
Jean H.

My wife and I both enjoyed this documentary. The way it was edited, we were able to follow the progress of the story as it unfolded. I was especially impressed by the way it dealt with the character of Custer. He was portrayed as a hard-nosed and controlling man. This movie presents a very different view of the man, one that shows him to be more human than he was in the history books. In the movie, he was a very arrogant man, but he was also a sensitive man who could be very persuasive when it came to negotiating with the Indians. The movie also shows how he was able to maintain a balance between the Indians and the white settlers, and how he was able to motivate his troops. He was a man who was driven by personal feelings and not by the needs of the country. I have to say that the movie did a great job of portraying Custer as a man who was fighting for the good of his country, not just for the good of his personal feelings. This is not a movie that is going to win any awards, but it was a good movie that I thought was well done.

David M. photo
David M.

All the best music from over 50 years of western music is featured in this documentary about a town in the American Southwest. What makes this film unique is that it is done in a cinematic style. When I first saw this movie, I thought it was just a regular movie with a good story. But when I thought about it a little bit more, I realized that the story really started to take shape. I realize that these people are not real. The thing that makes this film great is that we can understand that. These are people who live in a small town in the middle of nowhere. They have a good time, and they have everything they want. But it is not enough. They are driven by something that is not there. That is the longing for a family, for a father figure, for love, for friendship, for a sense of belonging. These people are the people I wish I could meet. But they are not real. That is what makes this film interesting. I am glad I got to see it. I think it is a great movie that is well worth seeing.

Lori Coleman photo
Lori Coleman

When you read the book, you know what you're getting into. When you see the movie, you know what you're getting into. The movie is not a bad adaptation, but it is a good adaptation. The movie is very well done and very enjoyable. It has some very well written scenes. I have to say, I was not disappointed. I would recommend this movie to anyone. It is well worth the watch.

Jack McCoy photo
Jack McCoy

I recently watched this movie after some of my friends recommended it. It was an interesting documentary and well written. It's a big topic, and I found it very entertaining. It's just too bad that it didn't get the recognition that it deserved. It was well put together and it's certainly a must-see.

Kyle Riley photo
Kyle Riley

We've heard it all before. "It's like 'Gone With The Wind' or 'The Big Sleep'. When you have the chance to see the most influential film of all time, what do you do? You choose something you know nothing about. And that's exactly what you did." The following quote is from "The Making of 'The Big Sleep'." It's not from the actual movie, but it applies here. On the way to Los Angeles in 1910, screenwriter Charles Beaumont (Charlie Hunnam) and fellow screenwriter Francis Ford Coppola (Timothy Hutton) stop at the port of Los Angeles. They find that a steamer has sunk, but as they try to salvage anything they can, they realize the ship is at least a year behind schedule. They also see that a huge iceberg is looming over the water, and if they wait long enough, it may hit them. This is the context for the entire film. Beaumont and Coppola take it upon themselves to work on the script of this film. They make notes and do research, so that they know the ins and outs of every aspect of the movie. It's a film that was over a decade in the making. With a large budget, they spend a lot of time talking about the production, about how it was made, and about how it's a unique film. They talk about the actual director, Victor Fleming. The story is based on a novel by Joseph Conrad, and was first published in 1898. The movie shows how much the movie had changed. It's dated, it's got bad production values, and it's a bit overlong. However, it's also a lot of fun to watch. You learn a lot about the actors and the story itself. The cast is great, especially the big stars: Tom Cruise, Haim, and John Cusack. Cruise does a great job, as does Haim, who also did a great job of voicing his character. Hutton, who played a villain in "War Horse," is terrific as the movie's villain. The real star of the show though, is Hutton. He's great in this, and he gives a really great performance. This is one of his best roles. His character is also the only one who has a character arc. He's a bad guy who gets his comeuppance, and he's then taken down a few notches, and he starts to do good things again. It's a very enjoyable film, and I recommend it to fans of the genre.

Laura photo

On a few occasions, I have been to Big Sur to watch some of the locals take in a documentary on a TV show. And one of the things I have noticed is that the locals really enjoy talking about the show. I am not an expert on the show, but I would think that would be a big part of the fun. I have never been to Big Sur, but I know that it is a beautiful place and it seems that the locals really appreciate the show and talk about it. I was wondering if I had ever heard about this show. I am sure there are people who have not seen it. And I was wondering if I could find out if anyone had ever seen it. So I am going to go back and see it. The program itself is very good, I think, although I would not recommend it to anyone who is not a Big Sur resident. The show is good to see because it shows the relationship between the people and their history. The show was shot in Big Sur and Big Sur Presidio, which is a historic area. The director and editor were able to gather as much of the footage as they could and use it to make a documentary about the people of Big Sur and their history. The acting is good, with some characters who are very well developed and believable. The dialog is clear and the editing is good. I have read many reviews of the program and some of them say that the dialogue is really bad. And I have to say that I am a bit skeptical about the dialogue being so bad. If you go to Big Sur to see the show and you do not see it, do not blame the people for not liking the show. There are people who like to talk about the show and they do it all the time. What they are missing is the context of the show and the history of the people. You cannot go to Big Sur and watch the show and not hear a lot of people talk about it. The show was shot in Big Sur and Big Sur Presidio and some of the people who are featured on the show say that they have never seen the show. If you go to the movie and see the movie and then watch the show, you may not know much about the people. But the show is very good and should be seen by people who live in Big Sur. I liked the show and the program, but I am sure that most of the people who do not know about it or like it have never heard of it.

Angela Aguilar photo
Angela Aguilar

I think that this movie is very well done. It's very funny and makes you feel the same way about the way things are going. I highly recommend this movie to everyone.

Joshua Rodriguez photo
Joshua Rodriguez

As a huge fan of the great Western movies of the 1940's and 1950's, I have to say that I'm not entirely surprised by this film's reception. It seems like there's a cultural bias against Westerns that's trying to find an artistic medium in which to express these iconic images. For those of us who know that, we can see this film as a triumph of artistic freedom and artistic integrity. The film's creators didn't have to sacrifice their artistic integrity to please the masses. Sure, the story is a little cliche and the characters are pretty one-dimensional, but what else would you expect? It's a film that gets you thinking about the time period and shows you the ingenuity that went into making the movies. Sure, the movie is far from a masterpiece and certainly doesn't hold a candle to the great Westerns of the past. But it does show that those who make the films must really want to tell a great story. This is a great example of artistic freedom and a great story.

Grace Edwards photo
Grace Edwards

I have never seen a documentary film before, so this was a very different experience for me. I went in knowing that I would be entertained, and I was. The film was well-made, the music was very good, and the photography was excellent. The film did a good job of portraying the differences in cultures, especially in the United States. There were many scenes that were extremely interesting, such as the one where the mother and father discuss the history of the ranch, or the scenes where the son is introduced to his father's new girlfriend. There were many other scenes that I will not spoil. However, the film did a very good job of showing the differences in cultures and the different views on the world. I would recommend this film to anyone who has a heart for the world and is open-minded. This film is definitely not for everyone, but it is a good film to watch.

Sean Patterson photo
Sean Patterson

This is a very interesting movie. If you are a fan of the Western genre, you will definitely enjoy it. It is also very unique and refreshing. I'm not a huge fan of movies that are made in a documentary style, but this one is different. I like the fact that this movie is very well made, the characters are very likable, and it is very interesting. I think that this movie is a great example of what is possible in a documentary style. I was very impressed with the way the movie was filmed. The characters are very interesting and have a very realistic way of speaking. I was very impressed with the way the director was able to capture the landscape. It was also very interesting to see how the town was filmed, it was very beautiful and the townsfolk were very interesting. I would recommend this movie to anyone who likes to watch a documentary style movie.

Ruth S. photo
Ruth S.

This is a great movie. As the title suggests it covers the history of the early years of the British Empire. It looks at the social and political changes of the British West Indies, the impact of the war of independence and of course the future of the empire. Some of the scenes look like a documentary, others seem to be art-house movies. The only real problem is that some of the voices have the sounds of an opera. That's the only problem I had with the movie. It's also a good movie. If you are into the history of the British Empire then I recommend this movie.

Theresa Adams photo
Theresa Adams

I had been a fan of the beautiful photography of Bisbee since the days of the early 1980's, when she shot "Why Not Go To War?" The film is narrated by the cameraman, and the narrator is the photographer. I'd like to say that this is a masterpiece of an art film, but it is not. It is a story told by a narrator and a cameraman, with little explanation of how the stories came to be. I'm sure I'll be the first to be accused of "borrowing" the narrative of another film, and I'm not sure I'd like that, since it means the stories were taken out of context and rearranged. I've also seen a couple of documentaries about the four men who became famous by shooting the great plains wildlife. Some of them do a great job at doing so, some of them aren't. "The Great Plains" is a documentary about the four men and the great plains wildlife. I would have liked to have heard more about the perspective they brought to the story, and maybe the perspective of the men in the story. Perhaps the cameraman's version of the story is more informed and more accurate. "The Great Plains" is a great film. It's one of the best made, and I recommend it highly.

Michelle photo

I wanted to watch this film because it was a documentary and I love history and anthropology. The people involved with this documentary are mostly students and some have gone on to careers in the field of anthropology. I have the utmost respect for them and their work. I am fascinated by the way they show the diversity of the people who live in the area. I love their interviews with people who have lived in the area for years and the great insight they offer into the lives of these people. It was amazing to see how different the people are from the rest of the world and how people have chosen to live in the area. It was also interesting to hear from some of the people that have not seen their entire lives. There were some beautiful interviews with people who live in the area. This is a film that I would recommend for anyone interested in the subject.

Thomas Jenkins photo
Thomas Jenkins

I didn't know what to expect when I first watched this film. I knew that it was going to be pretty tough to pull off a modern western, and I was right. The film has a great soundtrack, and the story is well told. The characters are well played, and the characters are very likable. The film was hard to watch for me, though, because I'm not really into westerns. I think I'm more into the Mexican westerns, and they're not really my type of film. But I didn't hate this film, and I was really impressed with it. It was worth watching, and I'd recommend it to anyone. The film is a bit long, and it's a little hard to follow at times, but I think that's why it was so great. The film isn't a bad film, but it's not the greatest western ever. I'd recommend it to anyone who's into westerns, but I'd also recommend it to anyone who's into westerns, but not really into westerns.

Angela photo

I think this is a great film, it is one of the best westerns ever made. The story is simple, and the character development is excellent. I also liked the way the actors portrayed the characters. I think it is also one of the best westerns I have ever seen. The only thing I didn't like about it is the ending, it is a bit too long and I think the movie would have been better if it had been shorter.

Lisa W. photo
Lisa W.

My first exposure to the movie was from watching it on the Sundance Channel. The movie itself was not that great, but it was interesting and well-done. I was a bit confused at first, as it seemed to have a lot of problems. But after watching it, I realized that the movie is about a lot of things. It is about human relationships, racism, the nature of war, the nature of personal relationships, and about the limits of human behavior. The film is not really about anything. But it is really about what we choose to do in our lives and what we choose to do in our relationships. I liked the movie, and I think that it was worth seeing. I also liked the way that it was filmed. The cinematography was really good, and it seemed to be in the style of a documentary. The music was also good. It was very similar to the music that is used in "The Brothers McMullen." I also liked the way that the movie was filmed. It seemed to be in the style of a documentary. Overall, I thought that the movie was a good movie. It was very interesting, and it was very well-done. I would recommend it to anyone who wants to see a movie about human relationships.