Anschauen In Darkness

In Darkness

In Darkness is a movie starring Natalie Dormer, Emily Ratajkowski, and Ed Skrein. A blind musician hears a murder committed in the apartment upstairs from hers that sends her down a dark path into London's gritty criminal underworld.

Other Titles
Sötétségben, Entre sombras, Karanlıkta, In Darkness - Nell'oscurità, インビジブル 暗殺の旋律を弾く女, La part obscure, Na Escuridão, En la oscuridad
Running Time
1 hours 50 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Mystery, Thriller
Anthony Byrne
Natalie Dormer, Anthony Byrne, Natalie Dormer
Ed Skrein, Emily Ratajkowski, Joely Richardson, Natalie Dormer
Audio Languages
Deutsch, English, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

A blind musician hears a murder committed in the apartment upstairs from hers that sends her down a dark path into London's gritty criminal underworld.

Comments about mystery «In Darkness» (26)

Elizabeth S. photo
Elizabeth S.

I think this film is great! It has a very dark atmosphere and not only does it tell a story of a killer using various techniques to kill people but it also has an idea of a murder mystery. This film is a must see! It is one of my favorite films of all time and I think it deserves to be in the IMDb Top 250 list. It is a great film for the horror fans and the fans of mystery films. I would recommend this film to anyone!

Raymond Patel photo
Raymond Patel

It's been a while since I've watched a movie that had the power to move me, but this movie did that. It is a wonder that such a great movie hasn't already been made. Like always, people are complaining that the ending is too depressing and that it is too dark and "not like the original". It's an excellent ending and I've never seen a movie that had such a nice and complete ending. The only thing I didn't like is that I didn't know who was killing the girls until the very end of the movie. And that's a shame because they should have shown more about them and why they were doing the killings. I give it an A+ 10 out of 10.

Willie Brewer photo
Willie Brewer

As I sit and ponder this review, it's like I've been watching a documentary about a series of murders. I feel like I'm watching the future unfold before me. As with the original, I felt a lot of the suspense of the first film was ripped right out of the plot. The pacing was a little off, which is to be expected in a small budget movie, but I believe this is because the writers were also the same writers of the original. That being said, I really do not feel the original film suffered from any shortcomings, the direction was great, the cast was perfect. I truly felt a sense of doom that permeated the movie. It was as if the audience felt a real sense of dread and danger, and I feel the best way to show this is to compare the two films side by side. I think this film will be remembered as a classic, because of its suspense and visual brilliance. It will always hold up as one of my favorites.

Justin photo

I saw this film the first time back in 1999, and I've seen it again and again, each time getting more and more intrigued. I would recommend this movie to anyone. It's not for everyone, but I'm happy to have seen it and can say that it is more than worth it.

Angela B. photo
Angela B.

Well, this was a big disappointment for me. This movie was too "O.K." and not "O.K." enough. The movie was in my opinion too long. When you have a movie with a run-time of 1 hour & 48 minutes, the length of the movie should be the same. You should make it a big movie with a big cast, with a big cast that you can get involved with. I like Jeff Bridges. I like Julie Christie. I like his character. But this movie was not interesting enough. I do not understand why this movie was called "The Mask of Zorro". I thought the character was not interesting enough. And his character was too much like the character in the classic movie "The Kid from Louisiana". I liked the main character in the movie. I liked his acting. I liked his character. But his character was too much like the character in the classic movie "The Kid from Louisiana". That's what I thought. Overall, I was not impressed with this movie. I think I would have preferred to watch "The Mask of Zorro" again instead of watching this movie.

Jonathan C. photo
Jonathan C.

Barry Hines is the psychiatrist on duty at the insane asylum. He's on the clock, and his job is to keep the patients from harming themselves or others. His conscience gets the better of him when he sees the same patient twice. They both stab each other to death, and he's only saved by the arrival of a doctor, who immediately orders Hines to kill the patient. The doctor is none other than Jack Crawford (played by Dennis Hopper), who Hines is trying to help. However, Crawford is out to get revenge for his sister, who was brutally murdered by Hines' old patient, the all-too-familiar Hannibal Lecter. Crawford is played by the great Sidney Pollack, who was once a friend of Hitchcock, and his performance is one of the most chilling things in the film. Pollack has a very different style to the usual serial killer-slasher type films. He makes Crawford as cruel and cold as the character he plays, and he's pretty good at it. There are a few problems with this film. The story is really quite simple, and I wouldn't mind if it was. But Pollack's performance is very effective at conveying the tension in the film, and he's always good at drawing out the quiet, sadistic atmosphere of the film. However, the movie just seems to drag on a bit. The pacing is all over the place, and the film feels like it's running too long. Also, the film doesn't feel very atmospheric, which is a good thing, because I think the suspense is what keeps the movie from being boring. Overall, this is a pretty good film. It's not great, but it's not terrible, either. The acting is really good, the plot is simple, and Pollack's performance is very effective. However, the film just seems to drag on a bit, and the pacing is all over the place. There are some minor problems, but overall, this is a good film. It's a film that's enjoyable from start to finish, and it's a good movie to see with your friends.

Denise Alvarado photo
Denise Alvarado

This movie is just outstanding. Its one of those rare movies that can make you think about what you are seeing and why. It keeps you wondering until the end. And the thing that keeps it so good is the camera work. I would be willing to bet that no other camera work since have captured the movie so well. The scene in the church is absolutely haunting. It is one of the most beautiful shots I've ever seen. The same goes for the end scene. It is one of the most powerful scenes in cinema. Its like the actors were scared. They don't look afraid. They look terrified. It's the best thing I've ever seen in a movie. The script is brilliant. It was a great idea and the script is just perfect. The actors have such great chemistry. This movie was perfect for me. I would give it 10 out of 10. I would recommend it to anyone.

Christopher P. photo
Christopher P.

The story of a couple's first anniversary is nothing new. This is not a bad movie. But it is definitely worth seeing. The actors were very good. It is nice to see Lorna Raver in a movie again. This movie will make you laugh and get your brain working.

Betty Harris photo
Betty Harris

So, when I first heard about this movie, I thought it would be a fairly ordinary thriller, which was more or less what it was, so I was not too excited. Then, my friend suggested that we watch it, so we did. I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was a very good thriller, which made me think of it as a new Stephen King novel, which made me love it. The plot is a good one. The film is very suspenseful. It is about a young girl, Alice, who is raped, and after that the film is about her recovery from the trauma. The acting was great. Morgan Freeman is outstanding in the lead. This is a good movie. If you like suspense and suspenseful movies, this one is for you.

Samantha W. photo
Samantha W.

The very first time I saw this movie I thought it was awful. I was pretty bored and didn't really care for the movie at all. But, recently I've been watching it again and again. It's an entertaining movie and I like it. I didn't know who Sarah was when I first saw it and now I think I know who she is. It was a great movie. It's not really the type of movie you would go see with a group of friends, but it's a good movie to watch alone. The movie is quite slow but you'll be quite entertained. The acting is good. The movie doesn't have a lot of violence. It's just a story of two people who have been through a lot and come together. It's also a very good movie for anyone who likes a story that will keep you interested. I really recommend this movie.

Christopher S. photo
Christopher S.

I first saw this film when it came out on video in the mid 80's. I was impressed with the cinematography and editing. I was quite surprised when the movie became a hit on TV. I never thought I'd see the day that a movie would be shown on TV that was both entertaining and dramatic. I thought the acting was solid and believable. The premise of the story was original and interesting. The plot was never as simple as the characters seemed to think it was. This movie is definitely one to watch and enjoy. I do believe that the ending was a little bit predictable but it was a well done ending to an interesting movie. I would say that the DVD version is better than the theatrical release. The sound is a little bit grainy but it still captures the feel of the movie. The special features on the DVD are quite good and very informative. This movie is not for everyone. I do believe that the ending is somewhat predictable but I think that the story is much better than the ending of this movie.

Karen Henry photo
Karen Henry

I must admit that I've seen many of the IMDb comments and it is very difficult to get a grasp on how they all stack up. In any case, I found it quite difficult to understand why the few who said this movie was terrible and overrated were so upset with the quality of the movie. As a horror film, it was good. It's worth a look and I'll be watching it again. It was a good watch. It wasn't anything new, but I guess I could appreciate that. I gave it a 7 out of 10. This isn't a movie to watch again and again. You'll see it once. It was good. It's worth a look. Good, but not great.

Catherine A. photo
Catherine A.

I am very glad I saw this movie. After watching the other films of the genre that I have, I feel a great sense of accomplishment. This film is very well done and you get to see the intense, realistic fight scenes that are extremely well done and believable. The film is filled with excellent actors that bring their A game, and they play their parts well. Tom Hardy is probably the most convincing Batman villain I have ever seen. He is one scary villain. He has that evil personality and you can't help but hate him. There are several fantastic scenes in this film. The last scene is absolutely mind blowing and it leaves you breathless. I would recommend this film to anyone who wants to see a really great movie that will leave you feeling good. 10/10

Sharon photo

A wonderful film from a wonderful director. Tom Hooper is one of the most original directors working today. A short film, 'The Break-In' has become a classic in it's genre. The cast was perfect, and the film has an outstanding visual flair. In the end, it's a very original film with a terrific cast. 'The Break-In' is a must see. Recommended.

Joyce Fields photo
Joyce Fields

Saw this at the early screenings in Philadelphia, in a very late screening. A complete stranger, who I had met before in Seattle, introduced me to this movie. We have been friends since the early 1990s and now we go to the same movies. This was a nice, fresh, unexpected movie. The story line is good and seems to be being developed well. It was a little bit slow in the middle, but not to the point where I was too bored to stay with it. The atmosphere was quite dark and the suspense in the movie was definitely there. I really enjoyed this movie and would recommend it to anyone, especially the families who can find something to enjoy in a horror movie.

Gerald P. photo
Gerald P.

After all the hype about this film, I finally watched it. The first 30 minutes of the film was very well done. I was very impressed with the main actor's acting and I found the mystery very interesting. Then the movie fell apart, and I started to realize that the mystery was far from being solved. This film had potential to be an intriguing thriller, but as it went on it lost all the mystery. The movie was too long, and I didn't feel the movie ending was satisfactory. I'm glad I watched this movie, but it wasn't good.

Thomas photo

The original "Night of the Living Dead" was a modern classic in the horror genre. I'm a huge fan of the original and have been ever since. I also like the remake, which was also very well made and the remake that followed was just as good. This film is the remake of the original. The original had the best effects of the entire series, and this movie has them all. I think the acting is a little over the top, but it's still very good. The director of this movie, David Bruckner, did an amazing job with the special effects. I think this is one of the better zombie films I've seen, but not the best. I recommend this film to anyone that has seen the original, but not the remake. I give this film a B-.

Danielle photo

I really liked this movie, it had all the elements of a thriller movie. The cast is great and the music score is incredible. I can't wait to see it again. I just watched it again and it was even better! The acting is very good, even though some of the dialogue is a bit cheesy, and the cinematography is excellent. I loved the use of shots of trees in the foreground and backgrounds, and the use of mirror images. I recommend this movie to anyone who loves a good thriller movie.

Kathleen photo

To some people this movie would seem like a remake of a classic film. To me it's like a modern day classic and there's no way I would go back to this film. The plot of this film is simple. Four women are stalked by a mysterious killer, who kills them off one by one. And one of the women is played by Eva Mendes. Eva Mendes is a veteran actress who's been in many great films. This movie really seems like a remake of a classic film. But it's not. Eva Mendes plays one of the women in this movie. This is a fantastic performance. I've never seen her in a film before. She really makes this film work. She's not only the leading actress in this film, she's the leading actress in all of them. It's a great performance. This film really takes you back to when it was a classic film. There's no doubt that this is a great film and if you haven't seen it yet, you should. I'm going to give this film a 10 out of 10. That's just how good this film is. I recommend this film to everyone. The reason I say this is because this film is so entertaining. The main character is so likable, the characters are all well-developed. The plot is really entertaining. The film is interesting and different. And it's really suspenseful. The way the film plays out is different than any other horror film I've ever seen. This film really takes you back to a time when horror films were different. This is a great film. If you like a good horror film, you should check this one out. I really recommend this film. This film is really good.

Jennifer Sandoval photo
Jennifer Sandoval

I just watched this movie and I have to say that it is one of the best movies I have ever seen. The storyline is simple but it has an amazing twist that makes it more than that. I really enjoyed this movie and I hope it is also nominated for an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay. All the actors are really great and I really like the movie. The movie is very original and keeps you guessing the whole time. I really liked the movie and I think it is worth seeing.

Amanda Cook photo
Amanda Cook

LOL. OK, this movie is too short for a full review. It is good to see the man who made this movie again, but I just can't take my eyes off of it. Now I know that the concept of the movie was to make a remake of the old B movie "DARK NIGHT", and that is what they did. That was a shame because this movie is really worth seeing. It's a lot better than the original. If you are not from the 70's, you should watch it. There is nothing wrong with this movie. I can't wait to see it again. The plot was good, and the movie is actually really good. I have always liked the original B movie and I have to say, I loved this movie. It is not perfect, but it's a good movie. The acting was pretty good, the music was good, and the movie itself is good. This movie has a nice surprise ending. It's not that exciting, but it is what you would expect from a horror movie. The movie was a very good, and I give it a 10 out of 10.

Crystal Howard photo
Crystal Howard

This is a good little thriller, not great but well worth seeing. The story is well constructed and is well paced, the actors are very believable and the locations are excellent. The use of the creepy, isolated and dark forest setting is a nice touch. A real eye opener, even though it is set in the near future. I have a problem with the use of the word "new", which is rather misleading and the film should have been called "the future" instead. If you like good, well made, quality independent films, this is a film for you.

Vincent D. photo
Vincent D.

Greetings from Lithuania. "The Day of the Triffids" (2007) is the best movie of the year. First of all, it's one of the best movies of the year. The cast is superb. There is no bad actors, no bad directors, no bad scenes, no bad photography, no bad editing. Just perfect! For me, it is also the best film ever. The fact that it is a supernatural horror movie is not a weakness, because it is not a supernatural horror movie. It is a very good movie, and a very good movie in general. It is truly amazing. Don't listen to the haters, because this movie is not a movie, it is a great movie. The cast is wonderful. The writing is very good, the camera work is very good. I am not a big fan of Steven Spielburg, but he is not a problem for me. And I believe that he is really good at directing, because it is so much better than "The Sixth Sense" and "Mama". The only thing I would like to say is that it is not a good movie to watch if you are suffering from headaches, because it will make you really sad. But, it is not a bad movie, it is a very good movie, so, I am recommending it to everyone. It is a movie to watch with your family and with friends. But, I would like to say that it is also a movie to watch with your girlfriend and with your girlfriend's friend. And you should watch it with them too, because this is really a good movie. I give it a 10/10!

Bruce H. photo
Bruce H.

OK. Some people like to have a "baggage" with their reviews. It is easy to see where they went wrong. I have to say that I'm a "2" and a "1" reviewer. This film was a dream. The colors were off-the-scale, the story line was strong, the characters were great. I was the only person in the theatre who left thinking "that was one hell of a ride". I would give it a 10/10 just for that. Not everyone will be a fan of that. I would say it is a nice change from the formulaic Hollywood "Shakespeare in Love" or "The Shawshank Redemption" type of film. This film is not about Hollywood. I would say that it is a nice "vibe" film. This film was definitely the best movie I have seen in a very long time. The story line was unique and captivating. I was always wanting to know more about the characters. The music was amazing, it was very "psychedelic". The art direction was superb. I really wanted to be in the movie. I was totally engrossed in every scene. It is not about the "hype" or what the critics say. It is a film that really deserves the praise it received. If you haven't seen it, do it, you will not regret it.

Olivia P. photo
Olivia P.

A famous actress (Irene Carstensen) has her best friend (Roddy McDowell) kidnapped by a mysterious man (Michael Madsen). What's the movie about? The plot is very similar to the original Night of the Living Dead (1968), but not as well executed. The story is also a bit dull in the beginning, but picks up in the middle. This is a good movie for the horror fans, but it is not as good as Romero's film.

Teresa Dean photo
Teresa Dean

For this film, I was expecting the most horrific ending imaginable. The film was indeed not as bad as I expected it to be. For a small town, it had a surprisingly good cast, and an excellent acting job by everyone. The twist at the end is predictable, but still worth the wait. The plot is actually pretty good, and the action sequences were quite well done. I'm a big fan of the original film, and I have to admit that I liked this one better. If you liked the original, you'll like this one too. If you are not a fan of the original, you might find the film disappointing.