Anschauen Bricked


Bricked is a movie starring Tracy Campbell, Terrence 'T.C.' Carson, and Shavonia Jones. High school grad finds himself in turmoil within his family as he battles coping with Bipolar disorder.

Running Time
1 hours 32 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Aleshia Cowser
Tracy Campbell, Aleshia Cowser, Aleshia Cowser
Shavonia Jones, Terrence 'T.C.' Carson, Tasia Grant, Tracy Campbell
Audio Languages
Deutsch, English, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

High school grad finds himself in turmoil within his family as he battles coping with Bipolar disorder.

Comments about drama «Bricked» (9)

Kimberly photo

A man from the rich and powerful becomes a homeless man and runs afoul of the law. His poor and non-professional life is on the line. The story is quite slow, but the performance of the two leads is great. There is an amazing performance by Jodie Foster. The film is about his life, but is also about his addiction to crack cocaine. This is not a film about the drug itself. The film is about the addiction and the effects it has on a person. The film is about people in the inner city who are addicted to crack cocaine. The film is a great story, but the performances of the lead actors are great and the story is interesting. It is not a bad film, but not a great film. It is a good film for people who want to learn more about the drug. I think it is better to watch the movie with an open mind, but not to be too critical. My rating is 7/10.

Janice Jones photo
Janice Jones

What a great movie. I was disappointed in the ending. But I loved it. I also loved the movie, and that is saying a lot. The only thing I was concerned about was the ending. What is wrong with you people? What happened?

Madison P. photo
Madison P.

I have always enjoyed the films of the Coen Brothers, they are always engaging, unique and never boring. In Bricked, the plot is thin, the dialogue is flat and the performances are wooden. The characters are cliched and they are not particularly interesting. The film is a series of interrelated vignettes that are presented as if they were a series of vignettes. The film has a slow pace, and it is the scenes between the characters that seem to drag on. The director, Jay Roach, seems to have chosen a style that is a bit uninspired. The cinematography is mediocre, the editing is confusing and the score is over-the-top. The characters are wooden and uninteresting, and the performances are flat. The dialogue is poor, and the characters are uninteresting. The film has a slow pace and is disjointed. It is a nice little film, but it is not one of the Coen Brothers best.

Lauren photo

You can't see it, but it's there. That's the only thing that keeps this movie going. It is about the love affair between two young women, whom you will never meet, but will certainly come to know, if only briefly. It is a story about the tenacity of two people. Their friendship and love for each other. This is not a movie for kids. I didn't like this movie, and I think I would have liked it even less if it were a children's movie. The acting is very good, the cinematography is very good, the score is great. However, I think the screenplay is just as important as the acting. If the screenplay were better, I think the movie would have been a lot better. In addition, the script is just too cliche, too predictable. The love story, the acting, and the dialogue are all fine, but the story itself is just too predictable. So, if you like the actors, and the actresses, this is the movie for you. If you are looking for a great movie, and don't mind a cliche, then this is the movie for you.

Charles Hunt photo
Charles Hunt

A young man named Michael (Rory Culkin) and his girlfriend Mary (Sarah Paulson) are recently married. Michael is a carpenter who works for a big company, but he also has a crush on a working girl named Angelica (Sara Paxton). Michael meets a rich woman named Ruth (Kirsten Dunst) who he immediately falls for. Michael finds out that Angelica is also a working girl, but he is not ready to admit it yet. Soon, Michael finds out that Ruth is pregnant. The whole thing is a little confusing, but I like how it's all presented. It's a little bit off-putting that Michael is the main character. It's still entertaining though. Sarah Paulson is very good as the pregnant woman. I think that she should have won an Oscar for this role. She's funny, but she also has a lot of depth to her character. It's a little hard to believe that Ruth is pregnant, but it's okay. You can't really say that it's a good thing that she's pregnant. I think that it's just because she's an older woman. The acting is not bad. It's not a good movie, but it's still entertaining. I recommend this movie to anyone who likes romantic comedies. It's not a great movie, but it's still entertaining. I give this movie a B-.

Albert S. photo
Albert S.

When this movie came out, I was skeptical, because I was a fan of the book. Now that I have watched it, I have to say that the movie is just as good as the book. The acting was great, and the directing was superb. The story is a bit different than the book, but it all works out in the end. The story is good, the acting is good, and the direction is superb. If you haven't seen this movie yet, you should. It's an awesome movie, and it will make you think.

Jose W. photo
Jose W.

It's a hard act to follow. After all, you have to start somewhere. And so, the film was able to keep my attention, despite the fact that it is full of plot holes. It is not without its flaws though. The movie is made in a very down-to-earth fashion, which is in my opinion a great way to make a film. But it is not without it's flaws. One of the biggest flaws is that there is a very long period of time in which nothing happens. In the beginning of the film, there is a lot of speculation about what the future will be like. And then you see the train crash, and then you see a very long period of nothing happening. I think it is a flaw in the plot, and that it would have been much better to have a bit more plot. The movie is definitely worth seeing, but it is not a must see.

Jacqueline R. photo
Jacqueline R.

I thought the film was well done, but could have been better. I think that the acting was superb, especially by the main character. The screenplay was excellent, but the way the ending was done left a lot to be desired. It could have been done so much better. But all in all, I enjoyed the film and would recommend it to anyone who enjoys a good drama.

Gerald M. photo
Gerald M.

Like many others, I saw this movie at the cinema. I thought it was great, it was different from other movies that I have seen, and it had a very interesting plot. I thought the ending was a bit rushed, and the character development was not as well developed as it could have been. However, I still thought it was a great movie, and I would definitely recommend it to anyone who likes to think for themselves. I would also like to point out that the people who review this movie in this forum seem to have very low expectations for the movie, which is a shame, because they are clearly not real movie critics. The acting is good, and the characters are well developed, the story is well done, and the cinematography is great. It has a very dark atmosphere, and the camera work is great, with the use of the slow motion, and the overall look of the film is very cool. It is definitely not a movie for everyone, but if you like to think for yourself, and have an open mind, you should like this movie. There is no blood, violence, or sex in this movie. The movie is a very different movie than most other movies, and I would recommend it to anyone who likes to think for themselves.